public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Bump pin_count to UINT_MAX.
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 17:09:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c38d7168-2d8e-8559-df2e-a923d426d1f1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160523142504.GE19361@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>

Op 23-05-16 om 16:25 schreef Chris Wilson:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:37:41PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> With nonblocking unpin there can be many cursor pins before they're
>> cleared by the next page flip.
>>
>> Fix this by extending pin_count to the full 32-bit to prevent a
>> WARN_ON(vma->pin_count == DRM_I915_GEM_OBJECT_MAX_PIN_COUNT)
> This is a hack that affects non-KMS paths. Being able to process binding
> in a single operation on all architectures is something we want to
> preserve.
>
> Why is every cursor movement generating an unpin work? Should I just
> start poking registers from userspace to avoid a silly kerenl?
> -Chris
>
All the unpin work gets batched till after the next vblank, it's not very efficient
but if you want to fix it you should just add the vma to plane state already.

According to Ville unpin count would still be too low on BXT/SKL, so it wouldn't
remove the need for this patch anyway..

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-23 13:37 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: Fix warnings from atomic nonblocking unpin Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-23 13:37 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Wait for flips to complete before returning Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-23 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Bump pin_count to UINT_MAX Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-23 14:25   ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-23 15:09     ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2016-05-23 15:43       ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-23 16:09         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-23 21:30           ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-24  8:22   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-23 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Wait for flips to complete before returning Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-23 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/2] Revert "drm/i915: Allow nonblocking update of pageflips." Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-23 14:53 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Wait for flips to complete before returning Patchwork
2016-05-23 15:16 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c38d7168-2d8e-8559-df2e-a923d426d1f1@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox