Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/trace: Remove engine out of the context sandwich

[Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>]

On 25/05/18 11:28, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 25/05/18 09:26, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> In the string tracepoint representation we ended up with the engine
>> sandwiched between context hardware id and context fence id.
>>
>> Move the two pieces of context data together for redability.
>>
>> Binary records are left as is, that is both fields remaing under the
>> existing name and ordering.
>>
>> v2:
>>   * Do not consolidate the printk format, just reorder. (Lionel)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>
> Maybe there was misunderstanding on my previous comment.
> What I wanted to let you know is that the parser in igt doesn't know 
> (yet) how to deal with "engine=%u:%u".

Duh! Actually I'm wrong about that!
It's all fine for the parser. Just need to update the overlay logic.


> The ordering of the field doesn't matter though.
>
> Updating the parser is probably a one liner. There is some interesting 
> logic behind though that expect the engine ids to be contiguous numbers.
>
> Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
>> index 7acea4052798..bac582ed3a0b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
>> @@ -638,9 +638,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_queue,
>>                  __entry->flags = flags;
>>                  ),
>>   -        TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, 
>> seqno=%u, flags=0x%x",
>> -              __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
>> -              __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> +        TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, 
>> flags=0x%x",
>> +              __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
>> +              __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>>                 __entry->flags)
>>   );
>>   @@ -668,9 +668,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_request,
>>                  __entry->global = rq->global_seqno;
>>                  ),
>>   -        TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, 
>> seqno=%u, global=%u",
>> -              __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
>> -              __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> +        TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, 
>> global=%u",
>> +              __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
>> +              __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>>                 __entry->global)
>>   );
>>   @@ -718,9 +718,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in,
>>                  __entry->port = port;
>>                  ),
>>   -        TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, 
>> seqno=%u, prio=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
>> -              __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
>> -              __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> +        TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, 
>> prio=%u, global=%u, port=%u",
>> +              __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
>> +              __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>>                 __entry->prio, __entry->global_seqno, __entry->port)
>>   );
>>   @@ -750,9 +750,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_out,
>>                  __entry->completed = i915_request_completed(rq);
>>                  ),
>>   -            TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, 
>> seqno=%u, global=%u, completed?=%u",
>> -                  __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
>> -                  __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> +            TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, 
>> seqno=%u, global=%u, completed?=%u",
>> +                  __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
>> +                  __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>>                     __entry->global_seqno, __entry->completed)
>>   );
>>   @@ -842,9 +842,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_wait_begin,
>>                  __entry->flags = flags;
>>                  ),
>>   -        TP_printk("dev=%u, hw_id=%u, engine=%u:%u, ctx=%u, 
>> seqno=%u, global=%u, blocking=%u, flags=0x%x",
>> -              __entry->dev, __entry->hw_id, __entry->class,
>> -              __entry->instance, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>> +        TP_printk("dev=%u, engine=%u:%u, hw_id=%u, ctx=%u, seqno=%u, 
>> global=%u, blocking=%u, flags=0x%x",
>> +              __entry->dev, __entry->class, __entry->instance,
>> +              __entry->hw_id, __entry->ctx, __entry->seqno,
>>                 __entry->global, !!(__entry->flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED),
>>                 __entry->flags)
>>   );
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx