From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915/vrr: Add state checker for dc balance params
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:06:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce3dc277-0158-46b0-b0db-30521f99a5c1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734dz18lf.fsf@intel.com>
On 4/23/2025 3:51 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 4/21/2025 9:18 PM, Mitul Golani wrote:
>>> Add state checker for dc balance params. Also add macro to
>>> check source support.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 +++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> index 274d01552ccf..4a21acb88aa7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>> @@ -5402,6 +5402,13 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_LLI(cmrr.cmrr_m);
>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_LLI(cmrr.cmrr_n);
>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(cmrr.enable);
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.vmin);
>> Add check for vrr.dc_balance.enable?
> They should match regardless, no? Something's wrong if they differ.
Hmm... as I understand when we are in fixed refresh rate mode this will
not be enabled.
This gets enabled only when VRR is enabled from the user-space, so they
can be different.
Regards,
Ankit
>
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.vmax);
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.guardband);
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.slope);
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.max_increase);
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.max_decrease);
>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(vrr.dc_balance.vblank_target);
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (!fastset || intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display)) {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
>>> index fb96d03bbf03..e8802348e5fa 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
>>> @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ void intel_vrr_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> {
>>> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
>>> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
>>> - u32 trans_vrr_ctl, trans_vrr_vsync;
>>> + u32 trans_vrr_ctl, trans_vrr_vsync, dcb_ctl;
>>> bool vrr_enable;
>>>
>>> trans_vrr_ctl = intel_de_read(display,
>>> @@ -802,6 +802,24 @@ void intel_vrr_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>> else
>>> crtc_state->vrr.enable = vrr_enable;
>>>
>>> + if (HAS_DC_BALANCE(display)) {
>>> + dcb_ctl = intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder));
>> dsb_ctl is not used. Need to use it for vrr.dc_balance.enable.
>>
>>
>> IMO we can introduce the new members (which is done in Patch#4), readout
>> and state checker in one patch.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ankit
>>
>>
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.vmin =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_VMIN(display, cpu_transcoder)) + 1;
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.vmax =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_VMAX(display, cpu_transcoder)) + 1;
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.guardband =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_GUARDBAND(display, cpu_transcoder));
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.max_increase =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_MAX_INCREASE(display, cpu_transcoder));
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.max_decrease =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_MAX_DECREASE(display, cpu_transcoder));
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.slope =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_SLOPE(display, cpu_transcoder));
>>> + crtc_state->vrr.dc_balance.vblank_target =
>>> + intel_de_read(display, PIPEDMC_DCB_VBLANK(display, cpu_transcoder));
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * #TODO: For Both VRR and CMRR the flag I915_MODE_FLAG_VRR is set for mode_flags.
>>> * Since CMRR is currently disabled, set this flag for VRR for now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-21 15:48 [PATCH v2 00/13] Enable/Disable DC balance along with VRR DSB Mitul Golani
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] drm/i915/vrr: Refactor vmin/vmax stuff Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 6:49 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-25 11:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] drm/i915/vrr: Add functions to read out " Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 6:52 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-23 13:17 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-23 13:34 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] drm/i915/display: Add source param for dc balance Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 6:58 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] drm/i915/vrr: Add enable/disable calls for DC Balance Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:01 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] drm/i915/vrr: Add compute config for DC balance params Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:05 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] drm/i915/vrr: Add state dump for dc " Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 8:47 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] drm/i915: Extract vrr_vblank_start() Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:10 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] drm/i915/vrr: Implement vblank evasion with DC balancing Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] drm/i915/dsb: Add pipedmc dc balance enable/disable Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] drm/i915/vrr: Pause DC balancing for DSB commits Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:21 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915/vrr: Add state checker for dc balance params Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:24 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-23 10:21 ` Jani Nikula
2025-04-23 11:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-04-21 15:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/i915/display: Prepare state checker for dc balance enable Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:26 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-21 15:49 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915/vrr: enable dc balance bit Mitul Golani
2025-04-23 7:28 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-22 7:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Enable/Disable DC balance along with VRR DSB (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-22 8:16 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce3dc277-0158-46b0-b0db-30521f99a5c1@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox