From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: move and rename i915_runtime_pm
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:16:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf0812aa-b92b-6e7f-1423-561f6edf09da@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156037764521.10298.12343546015159675260@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On 6/12/19 3:14 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio (2019-06-12 19:37:43)
>> Asserts aside, all the code working on this structure is in
>> intel_runtime_pm.c and uses the intel_ prefix, so move the
>> structure to intel_runtime_pm.h and adopt the same prefix.
>>
>> Since all the asserts are now working on the runtime_pm structure,
>> bring them across as well.
>
> Wasn't patch 1 also a rename? Or am I being senile?
> -Chris
>
Patch one replaced i915 with rpm in a bunch of places in the runtime_pm
file, so more of a struct swap than a rename. This is the renaming patch ;)
Daniele
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/8] RPM Encapsulation Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: prefer i915_runtime_pm in intel_runtime function Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 22:10 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/i915: Remove rpm asserts that use i915 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: make enable/disable rpm assert function use the rpm structure Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/i915: move and rename i915_runtime_pm Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 22:14 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-12 22:16 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/i915: move a few more functions to accept the rpm structure Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/i915: update rpm_get/put to use " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/i915: update with_intel_runtime_pm " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/i915: make intel_wakeref work on the rpm struct Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2019-06-12 22:18 ` Chris Wilson
2019-06-12 19:24 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for RPM Encapsulation Patchwork
2019-06-12 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf0812aa-b92b-6e7f-1423-561f6edf09da@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox