From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915: Simplify intel_set_cdclk_{pre, post}_plane_update() calling convention
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:51:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1e1d43d2666f2b678f1a5c5f623407c39949137.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120174728.21095-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 19:47 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Move all the old vs. new state shenanigans
> into intel_set_cdclk_{pre,post}_plane_update() so that the caller
> doesn't need to know any of it.
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 44 ++++++++++------
> ----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h | 12 +-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 10 +----
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index 2a5491eb8af3..a2b1401dcfbb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1887,41 +1887,41 @@ static void intel_set_cdclk(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> /**
> - * intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update - Push the CDCLK configuration
> to the hardware
> - * @dev_priv: i915 device
> - * @old_state: old CDCLK configuration
> - * @new_state: new CDCLK configuration
> - * @pipe: pipe with which to synchronize the update
> + * intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update - Push the CDCLK state to the
> hardware
> + * @state: intel atomic state
> *
> - * Program the hardware before updating the HW plane state based on
> the passed
> - * in CDCLK configuration, if necessary.
> + * Program the hardware before updating the HW plane state based on
> the
> + * new CDCLK state, if necessary.
> */
> void
> -intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *old_state,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *new_state,
> - enum pipe pipe)
> +intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + /* called after intel_cdclk_swap_state()! */
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_state = &state-
> >cdclk.actual;
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_state = &dev_priv-
> >cdclk.actual;
> + enum pipe pipe = state->cdclk.pipe;
> +
> if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE || old_state->cdclk <= new_state-
> >cdclk)
> intel_set_cdclk(dev_priv, new_state, pipe);
> }
>
> /**
> - * intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update - Push the CDCLK configuration
> to the hardware
> - * @dev_priv: i915 device
> - * @old_state: old CDCLK configuration
> - * @new_state: new CDCLK configuration
> - * @pipe: pipe with which to synchronize the update
> + * intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update - Push the CDCLK state to the
> hardware
> + * @state: intel atomic state
> *
> - * Program the hardware after updating the HW plane state based on
> the passed
> - * in CDCLK configuration, if necessary.
> + * Program the hardware before updating the HW plane state based on
> the
> + * new CDCLK state, if necessary.
> */
> void
> -intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *old_state,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *new_state,
> - enum pipe pipe)
> +intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + /* called after intel_cdclk_swap_state()! */
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *old_state = &state-
> >cdclk.actual;
> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *new_state = &dev_priv-
> >cdclk.actual;
> + enum pipe pipe = state->cdclk.pipe;
> +
> if (pipe != INVALID_PIPE && old_state->cdclk > new_state-
> >cdclk)
> intel_set_cdclk(dev_priv, new_state, pipe);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> index 712cdaea4fef..a3fb7b8e8d31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> @@ -33,16 +33,8 @@ bool intel_cdclk_needs_modeset(const struct
> intel_cdclk_config *a,
> const struct intel_cdclk_config *b);
> void intel_cdclk_clear_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> void intel_cdclk_swap_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> -void
> -intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *old_state,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *new_state,
> - enum pipe pipe);
> -void
> -intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *old_state,
> - const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *new_state,
> - enum pipe pipe);
> +void intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state);
> +void intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state);
> void intel_dump_cdclk_config(const struct intel_cdclk_config
> *cdclk_config,
> const char *context);
> int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index de2ab44b9150..25b0eab019cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -15411,10 +15411,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (state->modeset) {
> drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state(dev,
> &state->base);
>
> - intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(dev_priv,
> - &state->cdclk.actual,
> - &dev_priv-
> >cdclk.actual,
> - state->cdclk.pipe);
> + intel_set_cdclk_pre_plane_update(state);
>
> /*
> * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV
> when we
> @@ -15450,10 +15447,7 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (state->modeset) {
> intel_encoders_update_complete(state);
>
> - intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(dev_priv,
> - &state->cdclk.actual,
> - &dev_priv-
> >cdclk.actual,
> - state->cdclk.pipe);
> + intel_set_cdclk_post_plane_update(state);
> }
>
> /* FIXME: We should call drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done()
> here
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-22 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 17:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/17] drm/i915: Global state rework Ville Syrjala
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915: Polish WM_LINETIME register stuff Ville Syrjala
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915: Move linetime wms into the crtc state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-29 14:05 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-01-31 15:07 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915: Nuke skl wm.dirty_pipes bitmask Ville Syrjala
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915: Move more cdclk state handling into the cdclk code Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:39 ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915: Collect more cdclk state under the same roof Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:43 ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915: s/need_cd2x_updare/can_cd2x_update/ Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 12:24 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915: s/cdclk_state/cdclk_config/ Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:51 ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915: Simplify intel_set_cdclk_{pre, post}_plane_update() calling convention Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:51 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915: Extract intel_cdclk_state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 18:51 ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915: swap() the entire cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 15:06 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915: s/init_cdclk/init_cdclk_hw/ Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 15:08 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915: Move intel_atomic_state_free() into intel_atomic.c Ville Syrjala
2020-01-24 15:19 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915: Intrduce better global state handling Ville Syrjala
2020-01-28 14:44 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-01-28 15:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915: Introduce " Ville Syrjala
2020-01-22 19:00 ` Souza, Jose
2020-01-22 19:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-27 15:02 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915: Convert bandwidth state to global state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 15:21 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915: Introduce intel_calc_active_pipes() Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 15:25 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915: Convert cdclk to global state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-21 14:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 17:03 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-27 17:15 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-01-27 17:54 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 17:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915: Store active_pipes bitmask in cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2020-01-27 17:11 ` Imre Deak
2020-01-20 18:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Global state rework Patchwork
2020-01-21 2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-01-21 13:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-01-21 17:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Global state rework (rev2) Patchwork
2020-01-21 18:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-01-23 0:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1e1d43d2666f2b678f1a5c5f623407c39949137.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox