From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, alexander.usyskin@intel.com,
tomas.winkler@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] component: alloc component_match without any comp to match
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:23:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4d38de5-660e-a2eb-7320-f1da0f8e6380@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180712082127.GG3008@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thursday 12 July 2018 01:51 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 07:41:26PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
>> If all the components associated to a component master is not added
>> to the component framework due to the HW capability or Kconfig
>> selection, component_match will be NULL at
>> component_master_add_with_match().
>>
>> To avoid this, component_match_alloc() is added to the framework,
>> to allcoate the struct component_match with zero associated components.
>> Hence component master can be added with a component_match with zero
>> associated components.
>>
>> This helps the component master bind call to get triggered always,
>> even if no component is registered for that particular master.
>>
>> This is useful if we use the component master for waiting for few
>> components(features), only if they are registered, else proceed with
>> the normal flow.
> registered is a bit confusing here, I'd go with "supported by the
> underlying hw". And maybe also explain that this is for big pci device
> drivers where only some small/optional things are external components, so
> different use-case from SoC drivers where the entire driver is always
> built up from lots of small components.
>
> When you submit this for real please also run script/get_maintainers.pl
> for the full Cc: list.
sure.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Uh, don't do this, ever. I didn't put my s-o-b onto this patch. If you
> want to credit me for the suggestion, use
>
> Suggested-by: ...
>
> s-o-b has legal meaning and is like signing a contract, you've just forged
> my signature here. Same applies to reviewed-by tags btw.
Since the idea is suggested by you, thought that its my responsibility
to give the credit. Sure got your point.
I will add Suggested-by: instead.
Thanks,
Ram.
> -Daniel
>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/component.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/component.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/component.c b/drivers/base/component.c
>> index 8946dfee4768..007fb738263a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/component.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/component.c
>> @@ -312,6 +312,36 @@ static int component_match_realloc(struct device *dev,
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> + * Allocate the match without any component_match_array elements.
>> + *
>> + * This function is useful when the component master might end up
>> + * registering itself without any matching components.
>> + */
>> +void component_match_alloc(struct device *master,
>> + struct component_match **matchptr)
>> +{
>> + struct component_match *match = *matchptr;
>> +
>> + if (IS_ERR(match))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (match)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + match = devres_alloc(devm_component_match_release,
>> + sizeof(*match), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!match) {
>> + *matchptr = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + devres_add(master, match);
>> +
>> + *matchptr = match;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(component_match_alloc);
>> +
>> +/*
>> * Add a component to be matched, with a release function.
>> *
>> * The match array is first created or extended if necessary.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/component.h b/include/linux/component.h
>> index e71fbbbc74e2..3f6b420a58f8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/component.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/component.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ void component_match_add_release(struct device *master,
>> struct component_match **matchptr,
>> void (*release)(struct device *, void *),
>> int (*compare)(struct device *, void *), void *compare_data);
>> +void component_match_alloc(struct device *master,
>> + struct component_match **matchptr);
>>
>> static inline void component_match_add(struct device *master,
>> struct component_match **matchptr,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-12 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-11 14:11 [RFC 0/3] I915 component master Ramalingam C
2018-07-11 14:11 ` [RFC 1/3] component: alloc component_match without any comp to match Ramalingam C
2018-07-12 8:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-12 8:53 ` Ramalingam C [this message]
2018-07-11 14:11 ` [RFC 2/3] drm/i915: component master at i915 driver load Ramalingam C
2018-07-12 8:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-07-12 9:00 ` Ramalingam C
2018-07-11 14:11 ` [RFC 3/3] drm/i915: Initialize HDCP2.2 and its MEI interface Ramalingam C
2018-07-11 14:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for I915 component master Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4d38de5-660e-a2eb-7320-f1da0f8e6380@intel.com \
--to=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox