From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel/atomic: Stop updating legacy fb parameters
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:31:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d53f57f4-3b80-781d-547e-1797de7252c1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205174054.GY10981@intel.com>
Op 05-12-17 om 18:40 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 06:00:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Even fbc isn't using this stuff anymore, so time to remove it.
>>
>> Cleaning up one small piece of the atomic conversion cruft at the time
>> ...
>>
>> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 29 -----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 1f7e312d0d0d..c883e14a06d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -10967,31 +10967,6 @@ intel_modeset_pipe_config(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static void
>> -intel_modeset_update_crtc_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>> -{
>> - struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> - struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>> - int i;
>> -
>> - /* Double check state. */
>> - for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
>> - to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config = to_intel_crtc_state(new_crtc_state);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Update legacy state to satisfy fbc code. This can
>> - * be removed when fbc uses the atomic state.
>> - */
>> - if (drm_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state, crtc->primary)) {
>> - struct drm_plane_state *plane_state = crtc->primary->state;
>> -
>> - crtc->primary->fb = plane_state->fb;
>> - crtc->x = plane_state->src_x >> 16;
>> - crtc->y = plane_state->src_y >> 16;
> crtc->x/y seem pretty safe to nuke here.
>
> Not quite sure about plane->fb. The core still messes around with that
> quite a bit. The lack of refcounting here seems strange too. I've been
> actually wondering if that mess is somehow related to the fb leak we
> have in CI on some machines.
>
>> - }
>> - }
>> -}
>> -
>> static bool intel_fuzzy_clock_check(int clock1, int clock2)
>> {
>> int diff;
>> @@ -12364,10 +12339,6 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - /* Only after disabling all output pipelines that will be changed can we
>> - * update the the output configuration. */
>> - intel_modeset_update_crtc_state(state);
>> -
>> if (intel_state->modeset) {
>> drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state(state->dev, state);
>>
>> --
>> 2.15.0
I don't think we should stop updating crtc->config, please move that loop to where intel_modeset_update_crtc_state() and you can have my r-b.
I already had a patch in my tree to do the same, but lost it.
plane->fb is safe to nuke, the atomic core updates it but we needed it earlier for FBC and back-then-not-quite atomic plane_update calls..
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-05 17:00 [PATCH] intel/atomic: Stop updating legacy fb parameters Daniel Vetter
2017-12-05 17:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-12-06 10:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2017-12-05 18:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-12-07 14:32 [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2017-12-07 14:49 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2017-12-08 10:21 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d53f57f4-3b80-781d-547e-1797de7252c1@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox