From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix BXT lane latenccy optimal setting with MST
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:00:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d777dbd7-ea5c-7108-7296-89a35aebb8e8@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171027134348.31190-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Op 27-10-17 om 15:43 schreef Ville Syrjala:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Call the DDI .pre_pll_enable() hook from the MST code so that BXT gets
> the correct lane latency optimal setting applied. And we obviously need
> to compute the correct value, and read it out to keep the state checker
> happy.
>
> While at it drop the useless 'encoder' parameter to
> bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask()
>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c | 3 +--
> 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 366ba74b0ad2..de32576b2540 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -4177,8 +4177,7 @@ bool bxt_ddi_phy_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum dpio_phy phy);
> bool bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum dpio_phy phy);
> -uint8_t bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> - uint8_t lane_count);
> +uint8_t bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(uint8_t lane_count);
> void bxt_ddi_phy_set_lane_optim_mask(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> uint8_t lane_lat_optim_mask);
> uint8_t bxt_ddi_phy_get_lane_lat_optim_mask(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 28c25cb9eb2c..d4b336cffe68 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -2673,8 +2673,7 @@ static bool intel_ddi_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv) && ret)
> pipe_config->lane_lat_optim_mask =
> - bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(encoder,
> - pipe_config->lane_count);
> + bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(pipe_config->lane_count);
>
> intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 3d62c63c0763..c34ffa959e90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ static bool intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu = slots;
>
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> + pipe_config->lane_lat_optim_mask =
> + bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(pipe_config->lane_count);
> +
> intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level(dev_priv, pipe_config);
>
> return true;
> @@ -182,6 +186,20 @@ static void intel_mst_post_disable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("active links %d\n", intel_dp->active_mst_links);
> }
>
> +static void intel_mst_pre_pll_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> + const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_dp_mst_encoder *intel_mst = enc_to_mst(&encoder->base);
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = intel_mst->primary;
> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &intel_dig_port->dp;
> +
> + if (intel_dp->active_mst_links == 0 &&
> + intel_dig_port->base.pre_pll_enable)
> + intel_dig_port->base.pre_pll_enable(&intel_dig_port->base,
> + pipe_config, NULL);
> +}
We really need to get better at locking in the future, but looks ok.
> static void intel_mst_pre_enable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> const struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
> @@ -311,6 +329,10 @@ static void intel_dp_mst_enc_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>
> intel_ddi_clock_get(&intel_dig_port->base, pipe_config);
>
> + if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv))
> + pipe_config->lane_lat_optim_mask =
> + bxt_ddi_phy_get_lane_lat_optim_mask(encoder);
> +
> intel_ddi_compute_min_voltage_level(dev_priv, pipe_config);
> }
>
> @@ -582,6 +604,7 @@ intel_dp_create_fake_mst_encoder(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, enum
> intel_encoder->compute_config = intel_dp_mst_compute_config;
> intel_encoder->disable = intel_mst_disable_dp;
> intel_encoder->post_disable = intel_mst_post_disable_dp;
> + intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = intel_mst_pre_pll_enable_dp;
> intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_mst_pre_enable_dp;
> intel_encoder->enable = intel_mst_enable_dp;
> intel_encoder->get_hw_state = intel_dp_mst_enc_get_hw_state;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
> index de38d014ed39..63b76eac018f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpio_phy.c
> @@ -567,8 +567,7 @@ bool bxt_ddi_phy_verify_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> uint8_t
> -bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> - uint8_t lane_count)
> +bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(uint8_t lane_count)
> {
> switch (lane_count) {
> case 1:
I don't have a BXT with DP-MST to test with, so this might need an ack by someone who does :)
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-27 13:43 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix BXT lane latenccy optimal setting with MST Ville Syrjala
2017-10-27 13:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-27 14:00 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2017-10-27 14:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-10-27 15:14 ` Patchwork
2017-10-27 15:43 ` Patchwork
2017-10-27 17:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-27 18:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-27 19:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d777dbd7-ea5c-7108-7296-89a35aebb8e8@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox