Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Handle lane polarity for DDI port
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:34:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7cd8482e8824213bcfea44b91cf66d0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCUrBZrCITUBmI2T@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 6:33 PM
> To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Souza, Jose <jose.souza@intel.com>; Roper,
> Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Handle lane polarity for DDI port
> 
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:12:09PM +0530, Uma Shankar wrote:
> > Lane Reversal is required for some of the DDI ports. This information
> > is populated in VBT and driver should read the same and set the
> > polarity while enabling the port. This patch handles the same.
> >
> > It helps fix a display blankout issue on DP ports on certain
> > platforms.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h |  2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c  |  3 +++
> >  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > index 7118530a1c38..dd51413e7f45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> > @@ -2674,6 +2674,23 @@ intel_bios_is_lspcon_present(const struct
> drm_i915_private *i915,
> >  	return HAS_LSPCON(i915) && child && child->lspcon;  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * intel_bios_is_lane_reversal_needed - if lane reversal needed on port
> > + * @i915:       i915 device instance
> > + * @port:       port to check
> > + *
> > + * Return true if port requires lane reversal  */ bool
> > +intel_bios_is_lane_reversal_needed(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > +				   enum port port)
> > +{
> > +	const struct child_device_config *child =
> > +		i915->vbt.ddi_port_info[port].child;
> > +
> > +	return child && child->lane_reversal; }
> > +
> >  enum aux_ch intel_bios_port_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  				   enum port port)
> >  {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> > index e29e79faa01b..f25190ecfe97 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.h
> > @@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ bool intel_bios_is_port_hpd_inverted(const struct
> drm_i915_private *i915,
> >  				     enum port port);
> >  bool intel_bios_is_lspcon_present(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> >  				  enum port port);
> > +bool intel_bios_is_lane_reversal_needed(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > +					enum port port);
> >  enum aux_ch intel_bios_port_aux_ch(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > enum port port);  bool intel_bios_get_dsc_params(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  			       struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, diff --git
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > index 3c4003605f93..2d6906f6995f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -4082,6 +4082,9 @@ void intel_ddi_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum port port)
> >  			intel_de_read(dev_priv, DDI_BUF_CTL(port))
> >  			& (DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL | DDI_A_4_LANES);
> >
> > +	if (intel_bios_is_lane_reversal_needed(dev_priv, port))
> > +		dig_port->saved_port_bits |= DDI_BUF_PORT_REVERSAL;
> > +
> 
> Not a huge fan of saved_port_bits in general but as long as we have it stuffing this in
> there seems like the best option.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Pushed the change to drm-intel-next. Thanks Ville for the review.

Regards,
Uma Shankar
> >  	dig_port->dp.output_reg = INVALID_MMIO_REG;
> >  	dig_port->max_lanes = intel_ddi_max_lanes(dig_port);
> >  	dig_port->aux_ch = intel_bios_port_aux_ch(dev_priv, port);
> > --
> > 2.26.2
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-11 11:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Handle lane polarity for DDI port Uma Shankar
2021-02-11 12:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-02-11 13:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-11 17:34   ` Shankar, Uma [this message]
2021-02-11 14:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7cd8482e8824213bcfea44b91cf66d0@intel.com \
    --to=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox