From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"Harald Freudenberger" <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
"Matthew Rosato" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
"Zhi Wang" <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] vfio: Move vfio_device driver open/close code to a function
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 22:36:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddd7b4b7-50bc-2ee3-9ba6-73628f5bb6dc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1-v1-4991695894d8+211-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com>
On 2022/10/26 02:17, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This error unwind is getting complicated. Move all the code into two
> pair'd function. The functions should be called when the open_count == 1
> after incrementing/before decrementing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 2d168793d4e1ce..d043383fc3ba2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,51 @@ bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
> return !WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(device->open_count));
> }
>
> +static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +
> + if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + /*
> + * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the read lock. If
> + * the device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release
> + * it during close_device.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + device->kvm = device->group->kvm;
> + if (device->ops->open_device) {
> + ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_module_put;
> + }
> + vfio_device_container_register(device);
> + mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_module_put:
> + device->kvm = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
> + if (device->ops->close_device)
> + device->ops->close_device(device);
> + device->kvm = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> +}
> +
> static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
> {
> struct file *filep;
> @@ -745,29 +790,12 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
> if (ret)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> - if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner)) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto err_unassign_container;
> - }
> -
> mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> device->open_count++;
> if (device->open_count == 1) {
> - /*
> - * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the read
> - * lock. If the device driver will use it, it must obtain a
> - * reference and release it during close_device.
> - */
> - mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> - device->kvm = device->group->kvm;
> -
> - if (device->ops->open_device) {
> - ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_undo_count;
> - }
> - vfio_device_container_register(device);
> - mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + ret = vfio_device_first_open(device);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_unassign_container;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>
> @@ -800,20 +828,11 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
>
> err_close_device:
> mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> - mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> - if (device->open_count == 1 && device->ops->close_device) {
> - device->ops->close_device(device);
> -
> - vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
> - }
> -err_undo_count:
> - mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + if (device->open_count == 1)
> + vfio_device_last_close(device);
> +err_unassign_container:
> device->open_count--;
> - if (device->open_count == 0 && device->kvm)
> - device->kvm = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> - module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> -err_unassign_container:
> vfio_device_unassign_container(device);
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
> @@ -1016,19 +1035,11 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>
> mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
> vfio_assert_device_open(device);
> - mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> - if (device->open_count == 1 && device->ops->close_device)
> - device->ops->close_device(device);
> -
> - vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
> - mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
> + if (device->open_count == 1)
> + vfio_device_last_close(device);
> device->open_count--;
> - if (device->open_count == 0)
> - device->kvm = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
>
> - module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
> -
> vfio_device_unassign_container(device);
>
> vfio_device_put_registration(device);
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-01 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-25 18:17 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] vfio: Move vfio_device driver open/close code to a function Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 7:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 14:36 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] vfio: Move vfio_device_assign_container() into vfio_device_first_open() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 7:38 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 14:37 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 17:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] vfio: Rename vfio_device_assign/unassign_container() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 7:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 14:39 ` Yi Liu
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Move storage of allow_unsafe_interrupts to vfio_main.c Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-26 21:24 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-28 18:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 22:45 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 13:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 15:18 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 15:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-07 18:05 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 18:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-08 22:55 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-09 1:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-09 3:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-09 13:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-10 2:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-09 18:28 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-10 19:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Use IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY for vfio_file_enforced_coherent() Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 7:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-03 4:38 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-04 19:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] vfio-iommufd: Allow iommufd to be used in place of a container fd Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 8:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 9:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01 11:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-03 4:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-02 7:28 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-07 23:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] vfio-iommufd: Support iommufd for physical VFIO devices Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 8:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-04 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] vfio-iommufd: Support iommufd for emulated " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 8:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-03 4:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] vfio: Make vfio_container optionally compiled Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 8:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-01 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 18:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] iommufd: Allow iommufd to supply /dev/vfio/vfio Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-26 21:31 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-28 18:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 22:53 ` Alex Williamson
2022-11-07 13:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-25 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD Patchwork
2022-10-28 23:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] " Nicolin Chen
2022-10-28 23:54 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-10-31 10:38 ` Yi Liu
2022-10-31 12:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-31 12:25 ` Yi Liu
2022-10-31 23:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 3:04 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 4:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2022-11-01 12:54 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-01 11:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-01 12:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-07 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddd7b4b7-50bc-2ee3-9ba6-73628f5bb6dc@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox