Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Kill GTT mappings when moving from GTT domain"
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:03:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0d58a$d7ivb@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tybrcet0.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:08:59 -0700, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:39:06 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > For the record, on my SugarBay, this patch on top of drm-intel-fixes and
> > mesa.git + your instruction streaming, regresses cairo-xlib 4.5s to 4.7s
> > (4%, with a claim of .1% stddev) and improves cairo-gl from 21.5s to 20.1s
> > (6.5%, with a claim of .5% stddev) for the firefox-talos-gfx. [This is a
> > system that can do under 2s for cairo-xlib using vmap and the perf
> > patches I posted before.]
> > -Chris
> 
> I was testing with semaphores enabled on the LLC series.  I'm curious
> how this revert could possibly regress cairo-xlib, though -- that seems
> very strange.

Moving back to LLC+semaphores (2.6.39-rc2+), firefox-talos-gfx:
xlib: 4.473
gl:  20.753

applying the patch:
xlib: 4.472
gl:  20.824

I'm just not reproducing the same issue you are seeing. Are you using a
standard distro Kconfig, or if not, can you send me yours?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-15 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-14 23:43 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Kill GTT mappings when moving from GTT domain" Eric Anholt
2011-06-15  9:39 ` Chris Wilson
2011-06-15 15:08   ` Eric Anholt
2011-06-15 16:03     ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2011-06-17 19:06       ` Eric Anholt
2011-06-18 11:43         ` Chris Wilson
2011-06-18 20:20           ` Eric Anholt
2011-06-19 16:28             ` Chris Wilson
2011-06-19 17:01               ` Eric Anholt
2011-06-19 17:14                 ` Chris Wilson
2011-06-19 21:20                   ` Eric Anholt
2011-06-19 21:49                     ` Chris Wilson
2011-06-21 16:17                       ` Remove the overhead of vm_insert_pfn() Chris Wilson
2011-06-21 16:17                         ` [PATCH 1/3] resource: Use a common string for .name = "System RAM" Chris Wilson
2011-06-21 16:17                         ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, pat: Perform interval rbtree lookup of memtype first Chris Wilson
2011-06-21 16:17                         ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, pat: Convert memtype_lock spinlock to a rwlock Chris Wilson
2011-06-21 18:09                       ` [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915: Kill GTT mappings when moving from GTT domain" Keith Packard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='e0d58a$d7ivb@orsmga002.jf.intel.com' \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox