From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Warning when reads or writes are dropped
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:26:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e39f63$3bs8fq@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120117110857.GJ4093@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:08:57 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 05:03:54PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The GTFIFODBG register gives us 3 error types when the fifo is accessed
> > and full. Whenever we do a forcewake_put we can check this register to
> > see if any of the CPU related errors occurred.
> >
> > Of more interest is perhaps the bit I am not checking which tells when
> > some other part of the chip makes a request and the FIFO is full. I
> > couldn't really decide on a good place to put that check.
> >
> > This patch seems to have value to me, but I'm not sure it's worth the
> > cost of the extra MMIO read`. (I've yet to see this occur, but I haven't
> > actually been running with it for very long).
> >
>
> This looks like a nice little patch here. Care to update it for
> spinlocked and multithreaded forcewake and maybe also check the other
> errors? And also add it to the error_state output (just base it on top of
> danvet/my-next to avoid conflicts with the oustanding error_state
> cleanup).
The advantage of placing the warning in _put is that we could identify
the sequence of register writes that trigger the error, so a stack trace
would be more useful i.e. a WARN instead.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-17 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-05 0:03 [PATCH] [RFC] drm/i915: Warning when reads or writes are dropped Ben Widawsky
2012-01-17 11:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2012-01-17 11:26 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='e39f63$3bs8fq@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com' \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox