Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bloomfield, Jon" <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
To: "Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/4] GuC HWCONFIG with documentation
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:08:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4b8110bbd2c486ca1fd9bbdd321048b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220208210503.869491-1-jordan.l.justen@intel.com>

Acked-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Jordan Justen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 1:05 PM
> To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/4] GuC HWCONFIG with documentation
> 
> This is John/Rodrigo's 2 patches with some minor changes, and I added
> 2 patches.
> 
> "drm/i915/uapi: Add query for hwconfig blob" was changed:
> 
>  * Rename DRM_I915_QUERY_HWCONFIG_TABLE to
> DRM_I915_QUERY_HWCONFIG_BLOB
>    as requested by Joonas.
> 
>  * Reword commit message
> 
>  * I added Acked-by to this patch, but this only applies in the
>    context of this version of the patchset. If my changes are
>    rejected, then please *do not* add my Acked-by to the other series.
> 
>    In particular, I do not want my Acked-by on the patch if the patch
>    mentions the HWCONFIG format, but is not willing to add that to the
>    actual uAPI.
> 
>    I also do not want my Acked-by on it if it mentions "consolidation"
>    of this data. Since we are dealing with open source projects (aside
>    from GuC), this doesn't seem appropriate.
> 
> "drm/i915/uapi: Add struct drm_i915_query_hwconfig_blob_item" adds a
> struct to the uAPI and documents the return value for
> DRM_I915_QUERY_HWCONFIG_BLOB. (Except, keys / values are still
> deferred to the PRM.)
> 
> "drm/i915/guc: Verify hwconfig blob matches supported format" does the
> simple verification of the blob to make sure it matches what the uAPI
> documents.
> 
> v2:
>  * Fix -Werror errors.
>  * Rebase to drm-intel/for-linux-next instead of
>    drm-intel/for-linux-next-gt, as this seems to be what CI wants.
>  * Fix u32 -> __u32. (Sorry, I was first testing in Mesa tree.)
>  * Add commit message for "Verify hwconfig blob" patch as requested by
>    Tvrtko.
>  * Reword text added to i915_drm.h as requested by Tvrtko. (Attempting
>    to indicate the overall blob ends right at the last blob item.)
> 
> v3:
>  * Add several changes suggested by Tvrtko in the "Verify hwconfig
>    blob", along with some tweaks to i915_drm.h from the feedback for
>    the same patch.
> 
> John Harrison (1):
>   drm/i915/guc: Add fetch of hwconfig table
> 
> Jordan Justen (2):
>   drm/i915/uapi: Add struct drm_i915_query_hwconfig_blob_item
>   drm/i915/guc: Verify hwconfig blob matches supported format
> 
> Rodrigo Vivi (1):
>   drm/i915/uapi: Add query for hwconfig blob
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile                 |   1 +
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h  |   1 +
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_errors_abi.h   |   4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |   3 +
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c   | 201 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.h   |  19 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c         |   6 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c             |  23 ++
>  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                   |  33 +++
>  9 files changed, 291 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_hwconfig.h
> 
> --
> 2.34.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-09 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-08 21:04 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/4] GuC HWCONFIG with documentation Jordan Justen
2022-02-08 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/i915/guc: Add fetch of hwconfig table Jordan Justen
2022-02-08 21:56   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-02-08 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915/uapi: Add query for hwconfig blob Jordan Justen
2022-02-08 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915/uapi: Add struct drm_i915_query_hwconfig_blob_item Jordan Justen
2022-02-08 21:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/i915/guc: Verify hwconfig blob matches supported format Jordan Justen
2022-02-08 22:49   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2022-02-08 22:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for GuC HWCONFIG with documentation (rev3) Patchwork
2022-02-08 22:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-08 23:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-02-09  1:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-02-09 19:08 ` Bloomfield, Jon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4b8110bbd2c486ca1fd9bbdd321048b@intel.com \
    --to=jon.bloomfield@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jordan.l.justen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox