From: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
To: "Navare, Manasi D" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
"Zuo, Jerry" <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"Li, Sun peng (Leo)" <Sunpeng.Li@amd.com>,
"nathan@kernel.org" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"airlied@gmail.com" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: Only define DP 2.0 symbols if not already defined
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:48:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea12af48-7caf-03e2-fb60-489bc5803c3c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c69ff90750f40ecad3cd4053bc46497@intel.com>
On 2021-09-28 23:58, Navare, Manasi D wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only]
>
> We have merged such DRM definition dependencies previously through a topic branch in order to avoid redefining inside the driver.
> But yes guarding this with ifdef is good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>
Ah, I merged it already. But thanks for your review.
I agree these are better defined in drm headers, with a preparatory
patch if needed by the driver. We're working on cleaning it up and
dropping the driver defines.
Harry
> Manasi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zuo, Jerry <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:11 PM
> To: Wentland, Harry <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Li, Sun peng (Leo) <Sunpeng.Li@amd.com>; nathan@kernel.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com; Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>; sfr@canb.auug.org.au; linux-next@vger.kernel.org; airlied@gmail.com; daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch; Wentland, Harry <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: Only define DP 2.0 symbols if not already defined
>
> [AMD Official Use Only]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
>> Sent: September 28, 2021 1:08 PM
>> To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; amd-
>> gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Zuo, Jerry <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
>> Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com; Li, Sun peng (Leo) <Sunpeng.Li@amd.com>;
>> nathan@kernel.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-
>> devel@lists.freedesktop.org; ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com;
>> manasi.d.navare@intel.com; Koenig, Christian
>> <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>;
>> sfr@canb.auug.org.au; linux- next@vger.kernel.org; airlied@gmail.com;
>> daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch; Wentland, Harry <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: Only define DP 2.0 symbols if not
>> already defined
>>
>> [Why]
>> For some reason we're defining DP 2.0 definitions inside our driver.
>> Now that patches to introduce relevant definitions are slated to be
>> merged into drm- next this is causing conflicts.
>>
>> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c:33:
>> In file included
>> from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgpu.h:70:
>> In file included
>> from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdgpu/amdgpu_mode.h:36:
>> ./include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h:1322:9: error:
>> 'DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_PHY_REPEATER' macro redefined [-
>> Werror,-Wmacro-redefined]
>> ^
>> ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dc_dp_types.h:881:9: note:
>> previous definition is here
>> ^
>> 1 error generated.
>>
>> v2: Add one missing endif
>>
>> [How]
>> Guard all display driver defines with #ifndef for now. Once we pull in
>> the new definitions into amd-staging-drm-next we will follow up and
>> drop definitions from our driver and provide follow-up header updates
>> for any addition DP
>> 2.0 definitions required by our driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc_dp_types.h | 54
>> ++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc_dp_types.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc_dp_types.h
>> index a5e798b5da79..9de86ff5ef1b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc_dp_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc_dp_types.h
>> @@ -860,28 +860,72 @@ struct psr_caps { };
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN)
>> +#ifndef DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_CAP
>> #define DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_CAP 0x006
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_SINK_VIDEO_FALLBACK_FORMATS
>> #define DP_SINK_VIDEO_FALLBACK_FORMATS 0x020
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_FEC_CAPABILITY_1
>> #define DP_FEC_CAPABILITY_1 0x091
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DFP_CAPABILITY_EXTENSION_SUPPORT
>> #define DP_DFP_CAPABILITY_EXTENSION_SUPPORT 0x0A3
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_CONFIGURATION
>> #define DP_DSC_CONFIGURATION 0x161
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_PHY_SQUARE_PATTERN
>> #define DP_PHY_SQUARE_PATTERN 0x249
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_128b_132b_SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES
>> #define DP_128b_132b_SUPPORTED_LINK_RATES 0x2215
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_128b_132b_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL
>> #define DP_128b_132b_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL
>> 0x2216
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_TEST_264BIT_CUSTOM_PATTERN_7_0
>> #define DP_TEST_264BIT_CUSTOM_PATTERN_7_0 0X2230
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_TEST_264BIT_CUSTOM_PATTERN_263_256
>> #define DP_TEST_264BIT_CUSTOM_PATTERN_263_256
>> 0X2250
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_SUPPORT_AND_DECODER_COUNT
>> #define DP_DSC_SUPPORT_AND_DECODER_COUNT 0x2260
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_AND_AGGREGATION_0
>> #define DP_DSC_MAX_SLICE_COUNT_AND_AGGREGATION_0
>> 0x2270
>> -# define DP_DSC_DECODER_0_MAXIMUM_SLICE_COUNT_MASK (1 <<
>> 0)
>> -# define DP_DSC_DECODER_0_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT_MASK
>> (0b111 << 1)
>> -# define DP_DSC_DECODER_0_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT_SHIFT 1
>> -# define DP_DSC_DECODER_COUNT_MASK (0b111 << 5)
>> -# define DP_DSC_DECODER_COUNT_SHIFT 5
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_DECODER_0_MAXIMUM_SLICE_COUNT_MASK
>> +#define DP_DSC_DECODER_0_MAXIMUM_SLICE_COUNT_MASK (1 <<
>> 0)
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_DECODER_0_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT_MASK
>> +#define DP_DSC_DECODER_0_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT_MASK
>> (0b111 << 1)
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_DECODER_0_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT_SHIFT
>> +#define DP_DSC_DECODER_0_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT_SHIFT 1
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_DECODER_COUNT_MASK
>> +#define DP_DSC_DECODER_COUNT_MASK (0b111 << 5)
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_DSC_DECODER_COUNT_SHIFT
>> +#define DP_DSC_DECODER_COUNT_SHIFT 5
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_SET
>> #define DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_SET 0x108
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_PHY_REPEATER
>> #define DP_MAIN_LINK_CHANNEL_CODING_PHY_REPEATER 0xF0006
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_PHY_REPEATER_128b_132b_RATES
>> #define DP_PHY_REPEATER_128b_132b_RATES
>> 0xF0007
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_128b_132b_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL_PHY_REPEATER1
>> #define DP_128b_132b_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL_PHY_REPEATER1
>> 0xF0022
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef DP_INTRA_HOP_AUX_REPLY_INDICATION
>> #define DP_INTRA_HOP_AUX_REPLY_INDICATION (1 << 3)
>> +#endif
>> /* TODO - Use DRM header to replace above once available */
>>
>> union dp_main_line_channel_coding_cap {
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 17:08 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/amd/display: Only define DP 2.0 symbols if not already defined Harry Wentland
2021-09-28 17:41 ` Zuo, Jerry
2021-09-29 3:58 ` Navare, Manasi D
2021-09-29 13:48 ` Harry Wentland [this message]
2021-09-28 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-09-28 18:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-28 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-28 21:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea12af48-7caf-03e2-fb60-489bc5803c3c@amd.com \
--to=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
--cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Jerry.Zuo@amd.com \
--cc=Sunpeng.Li@amd.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox