Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [10/12] drm/i915: Introduce HPD_PORT_TC<n>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:58:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb854ce65015611df9c9edabfd9a17a15651ba07.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200914144841.GP6112@intel.com>

On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 17:48 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 01:30:23AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-07-01 at 00:55 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <
> > > ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Make a clean split between hpd pins for DDI vs. TC. This matches
> > > how the actual hardware is split.
> > > 
> > > And with this we move the DDI/PHY->HPD pin mapping into the encoder
> > > init instead of having to remap yet again in the interrupt code.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <
> > > ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c     |  65 +++++++++-
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c |  25 +---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h              |  17 +--
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c              | 121 +++++--------------
> > >  4 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > index d024491738b3..a2c9815c5abc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
> > > @@ -4847,6 +4847,57 @@ intel_ddi_max_lanes(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dport)
> > >  	return max_lanes;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static enum hpd_pin tgl_hpd_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > +				enum port port)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (port >= PORT_D)
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_TC1 + port - PORT_D;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_A + port - PORT_A;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static enum hpd_pin rkl_hpd_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > +				enum port port)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (HAS_PCH_TGP(dev_priv))
> > > +		return tgl_hpd_pin(dev_priv, port);
> > > +
> > > +	if (port >= PORT_D)
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_C + port - PORT_D;
> > 
> > The above looks wrong, for it would match with only the return bellow.
> 
> On rkl+tgp we want:
> PORT_A (DDI A)   -> HPD_PORT_A
> PORT_B (DDI B)   -> HPD_PORT_B
> PORT_D (DDI TC1) -> HPD_PORT_TC1
> PORT_E (DDI TC2) -> HPD_PORT_TC2
> 
> On rkl+cmp we want:
> PORT_A (DDI A)   -> HPD_PORT_A
> PORT_B (DDI B)   -> HPD_PORT_B
> PORT_D (DDI TC1) -> HPD_PORT_C
> PORT_E (DDI TC2) -> HPD_PORT_D

oohh okay, missed this.

> 
> > > +	else
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_A + port - PORT_A;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static enum hpd_pin icl_hpd_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > +				enum port port)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (port >= PORT_C)
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_TC1 + port - PORT_C;
> > > +	else
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_A + port - PORT_A;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static enum hpd_pin ehl_hpd_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > +				enum port port)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (port == PORT_D)
> > > +		return HPD_PORT_A;
> > > +
> > > +	if (HAS_PCH_MCC(dev_priv))
> > > +		return icl_hpd_pin(dev_priv, port);
> > 
> > Maybe call tgl_hpd_pin() for HAS_PCH_MCC()? The code bellow will match but just for consistency.
> 
> On jsl+mcc we want:
> PORT_A/D (DDI A/D) -> HPD_PORT_A
> PORT_B   (DDI B)   -> HPD_PORT_B
> PORT_C   (DDI C)   -> HPD_PORT_TC1
> 
> on jsl+icp we want:
> PORT_A/D (DDI A/D) -> HPD_PORT_A
> PORT_B   (DDI B)   -> HPD_PORT_B
> PORT_C   (DDI C)   -> HPD_PORT_C
> 
> 

The above would be the output of tgl_hpd_pin() but okay as it can be associate with SPT, LPT, ICP and TGP better keep the current code.

Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-14 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200630215601.28557-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-12  1:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [10/12] drm/i915: Introduce HPD_PORT_TC<n> Souza, Jose
2020-09-14 14:48   ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-09-14 16:58     ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2020-09-14 17:06       ` Ville Syrjälä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eb854ce65015611df9c9edabfd9a17a15651ba07.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox