From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "# v4 . 10-rc1+" <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Check for timeout completion when waiting for the rq to submitted
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:28:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed1b4fa1-a5e6-4fcf-486a-b91f1c589ea1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170208165449.8419-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 08/02/2017 16:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
> We first wait for a request to be submitted to hw and assigned a seqno,
> before we can wait for the hw to signal completion (otherwise we don't
> know the hw id we need to wait upon). Whilst waiting for the request to
> be submitted, we may exceed the user's timeout and need to propagate the
> error back.
>
> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Fixes: 4680816be336 ("drm/i915: Wait first for submission, before waiting for request completion")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> index 72b7f7d9461d..69aff559cf8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
> @@ -1084,6 +1084,9 @@ long i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> if (timeout < 0)
> goto complete;
>
> + if (!timeout)
> + return -ETIME;
> +
> GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_done(&req->execute));
> }
> GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_done(&req->submit));
>
Perhaps "else if" would be more typical, but still OK for a fix.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-08 16:54 [PATCH] drm/i915: Check for timeout completion when waiting for the rq to submitted Chris Wilson
2017-02-08 17:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2017-02-08 17:54 ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-08 18:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-02-08 18:14 ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-08 18:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-02-09 9:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2017-02-09 9:24 ` Chris Wilson
2017-02-09 8:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Check for timeout completion when waiting for the rq to submitted (rev3) Patchwork
2017-02-15 12:54 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Check for timeout completion when waiting for the rq to submitted Joonas Lahtinen
2017-02-15 13:05 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed1b4fa1-a5e6-4fcf-486a-b91f1c589ea1@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox