From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Jon Bloomfield" <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
"Lionel Landwerlin" <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Jason Ekstrand" <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Rename i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu to i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:48:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed2865c4-bb18-7956-af23-6d3dca72a004@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YTXWmy0DRBmDtQVK@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 06/09/2021 09:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 09:05:00AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 02/09/2021 15:20, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> The important part isn't so much that this does an rcu lookup - that's
>>> more an implementation detail, which will also be removed.
>>>
>>> The thing that makes this different from other functions is that it's
>>> gettting you the vm that batchbuffers will run in for that gem
>>> context, which is either a full ppgtt stored in gem->ctx, or the ggtt.
>>>
>>> We'll make more use of this function later on.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>>> Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c | 2 +-
>>> 7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h
>>> index 18060536b0c2..da6e8b506d96 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.h
>>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ i915_gem_context_vm(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
>>> }
>>> static inline struct i915_address_space *
>>> -i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
>>> +i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
>>> {
>>> struct i915_address_space *vm;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>> index a094f3ce1a90..6c68fe26bb32 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c
>>> @@ -1456,7 +1456,7 @@ static int igt_tmpfs_fallback(void *arg)
>>> struct i915_gem_context *ctx = arg;
>>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = ctx->i915;
>>> struct vfsmount *gemfs = i915->mm.gemfs;
>>> - struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>>> struct i915_vma *vma;
>>> u32 *vaddr;
>>> @@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static int igt_shrink_thp(void *arg)
>>> {
>>> struct i915_gem_context *ctx = arg;
>>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = ctx->i915;
>>> - struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>
>> Problem here (and probably elsewhere) is that this test does no "eb", nor
>> even submits any requests for execution.
>>
>> More so, execbuf path does currently rely on intel_context->vm which is
>> always set. So I really wonder how it would look, what I touched on
>> elsewhere in the thread, if we instead made ctx->vm always point to
>> something. It would align the rules between intel_context and GEM context
>> and may end up with a more consistent situation.
>
> The entire thing is substantially more messy, and my few quick attempts at
> fixing this went flat.
>
> The thing is, this _is_ the vm we use for execbuf, patch 8 changes intel
> context initialization to also use this function. I do think it would make
> sense to always set the right vm in gem_ctx->vm, but when I tried to do
> that I've also tried to implement a bit stricter rules for
> intel_context->vm. Currently that's initialized to the single gt vm deep
> down in the per-type (virtual vs engine ctx) code, and then later on we'd
> overwrite that. My idea was that we'd no longer set the intel_context->vm
> in low-level code at all, but instead the variuos callers that create the
> ctx either pass the right vm down, or set it after initial setup is done.
>
> This way we'd be guaranteed that we never accidentally run a userspace
> context on the kernel's gt vm, which would be bad.
>
> The problem was that the entire refactor became really messy, and it was
> conflicting against the GuC stuff and the changed engines there, so I
> figured I'll drop it. There's more locking cleanup tbd, so I'll keep that
> on the list of things. Maybe once intel_context creation is a bit more
> untangled.
I understood you were dropping this from the series but now that I
noticed it all landed I realized you probably meant something else.
I think it's not ideal that you repeatedly ignored my comments to have a
cover letter and not mix independent work in the same series. I am
pretty sure this exact mode of operation was quite frowned upon, to put
it mildly, not so long ago.
If I need to be explicit - large series doing multiple things, with no
cover letter giving overview, plus merging with outstanding opens.
As I was not expecting this would go in so quick, I did not even read
the whole series yet.
Even on the most prosaic level I even disagree with putting execbuf in
the helper name which gets the VM from a GEM context. Proof in the
pudding is that you have non-execbuf parts of the driver using this helper.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> -Daniel
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>>> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>>> struct i915_gem_engines_iter it;
>>> struct intel_context *ce;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>>> index 4d2758718d21..fc7fb33a3a52 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>>> @@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ static int write_to_scratch(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>>> intel_gt_chipset_flush(engine->gt);
>>> - vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
>>> if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
>>> err = PTR_ERR(vma);
>>> @@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ static int read_from_scratch(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
>>> if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 8) {
>>> const u32 GPR0 = engine->mmio_base + 0x600;
>>> - vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
>>> if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
>>> err = PTR_ERR(vma);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
>>> index f12ffe797639..b3863abc51f5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c
>>> @@ -3493,7 +3493,7 @@ static int smoke_submit(struct preempt_smoke *smoke,
>>> if (batch) {
>>> struct i915_address_space *vm;
>>> - vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> vma = i915_vma_instance(batch, vm, NULL);
>>> i915_vm_put(vm);
>>> if (IS_ERR(vma))
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>> index 2c1ed32ca5ac..8be23e0f9306 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_hangcheck.c
>>> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static struct i915_request *
>>> hang_create_request(struct hang *h, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>> {
>>> struct intel_gt *gt = h->gt;
>>> - struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(h->ctx);
>>> + struct i915_address_space *vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(h->ctx);
>>> struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
>>> struct i915_request *rq = NULL;
>>> struct i915_vma *hws, *vma;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>>> index f843a5040706..2d60a5a5b065 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
>>> @@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ static int exercise_mock(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> if (!ctx)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> - vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> err = func(vm, 0, min(vm->total, limit), end_time);
>>> i915_vm_put(vm);
>>> @@ -1848,7 +1848,7 @@ static int igt_cs_tlb(void *arg)
>>> goto out_unlock;
>>> }
>>> - vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> if (i915_is_ggtt(vm))
>>> goto out_vm;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
>>> index dd0607254a95..79ba72da0813 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_vma.c
>>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int create_vmas(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> struct i915_vma *vma;
>>> int err;
>>> - vm = i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu(ctx);
>>> + vm = i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm(ctx);
>>> vma = checked_vma_instance(obj, vm, NULL);
>>> i915_vm_put(vm);
>>> if (IS_ERR(vma))
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-07 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 14:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Release i915_gem_context from a worker Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Release ctx->syncobj on final put, not on ctx close Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Keep gem ctx->vm alive until the final put Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Drop code to handle set-vm races from execbuf Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Rename i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu to i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm Daniel Vetter
2021-09-03 8:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-06 8:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-07 14:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Use i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm in ctx_getparam Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Add i915_gem_context_is_full_ppgtt Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-02 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 16:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-09-02 17:05 ` Bloomfield, Jon
2021-09-02 19:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Use i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm in intel_context_set_gem Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Drop __rcu from gem_context->vm Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: use xa_lock/unlock for fpriv->vm_xa lookups Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Stop rcu support for i915_address_space Daniel Vetter
2021-09-02 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Release i915_gem_context from a worker Patchwork
2021-09-02 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-02 17:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-02 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Release i915_gem_context from a worker (rev2) Patchwork
2021-09-02 18:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-02 18:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-03 6:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Release i915_gem_context from a worker (rev3) Patchwork
2021-09-03 6:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-03 6:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-03 8:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-13 20:30 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Release i915_gem_context from a worker Daniel Vetter
2021-08-13 20:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Rename i915_gem_context_get_vm_rcu to i915_gem_context_get_eb_vm Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ed2865c4-bb18-7956-af23-6d3dca72a004@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jason@jlekstrand.net \
--cc=jon.bloomfield@intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox