From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.auld@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:19:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee235ed1-a9bc-67ad-0df8-c09242921230@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210615113600.30660-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Op 15-06-2021 om 13:36 schreef Thomas Hellström:
> To help avoid evicting already resident buffers from the batch we're
> processing, perform locking as a separate step.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 201fed19d120..394eb40c95b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -922,21 +922,38 @@ static int eb_lookup_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int eb_validate_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> +static int eb_lock_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> int err;
>
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
> - struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry = &eb->exec[i];
> struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
> struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
>
> err = i915_gem_object_lock(vma->obj, &eb->ww);
> if (err)
> return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int eb_validate_vmas(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + int err;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eb->unbound);
> +
> + err = eb_lock_vmas(eb);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < eb->buffer_count; i++) {
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry = &eb->exec[i];
> + struct eb_vma *ev = &eb->vma[i];
> + struct i915_vma *vma = ev->vma;
>
> err = eb_pin_vma(eb, entry, ev);
> if (err == -EDEADLK)
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 11:36 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Perform execbuffer object locking as a separate step Thomas Hellström
2021-06-15 12:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-06-15 19:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-06-17 9:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ramalingam C
2021-06-17 10:07 ` Thomas Hellström
2021-06-17 10:19 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2021-06-17 15:35 ` Tang, CQ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee235ed1-a9bc-67ad-0df8-c09242921230@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox