public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the dma-fence timeout
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:25:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2d23a5e-391d-aa4b-e18b-8ad89066ffa2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117135713.2324-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 17/01/2018 13:57, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When testing that the timeout fired, we need to be sure we have waited
> just long enough for the timeout to have occurred and for the softirq
> (on another cpu) to have completed. Sleeping for an arbitrary amount is
> prone to error, so wait for the timeout instead and complain if it was
> too late.
> 
> v2: Use wait_event_timeout to provide an upper bound
> v3: Fix inverted check for wait_event_timeout timing out
> v4: Restore the check that the fences aren't signalled too early, by
> inspecting them before the expected timeout.
> 
> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104670
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
> index 4fb51deb81a1..570e325af93e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_sw_fence.c
> @@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ static int test_dma_fence(void *arg)
>   	sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(delay) / 3;
>   	usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
>   	if (time_after(jiffies, end)) {
> -		pr_debug("Slept too long, delay=%lu, skipping!\n", delay);
> +		pr_debug("Slept too long, delay=%lu, (target=%lu, now=%lu) skipping\n",
> +			 delay, end, jiffies);
>   		goto skip;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -702,18 +703,15 @@ static int test_dma_fence(void *arg)
>   		goto err;
>   	}
>   
> -	do {
> -		sleep = jiffies_to_usecs(end - jiffies + 1);
> -		usleep_range(sleep, 2 * sleep);
> -	} while (!time_after(jiffies, end));
> -
> -	if (i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> -		pr_err("No timeout fence signaled!\n");
> +	if (!wait_event_timeout(timeout->wait,
> +				i915_sw_fence_done(timeout),
> +				2 * (end - jiffies) + 1)) {
> +		pr_err("Timeout fence unsignaled!\n");
>   		goto err;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!i915_sw_fence_done(timeout)) {
> -		pr_err("Timeout fence unsignaled!\n");
> +	if (i915_sw_fence_done(not)) {
> +		pr_err("No timeout fence signaled!\n");
>   		goto err;
>   	}
>   
> 

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-17 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-17 12:15 [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the dma-fence timeout Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 12:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-17 12:44   ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 12:54     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-17 13:11 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 13:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-17 13:41     ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 13:15 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 13:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2018-01-17 13:29   ` Saarinen, Jani
2018-01-17 13:31     ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 13:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the dma-fence timeout (rev2) Patchwork
2018-01-17 13:57 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the dma-fence timeout Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 14:25   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-01-17 17:11     ` Chris Wilson
2018-01-17 14:02 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the dma-fence timeout (rev3) Patchwork
2018-01-17 14:20 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/selftests: Wait for the dma-fence timeout (rev4) Patchwork
2018-01-17 16:45 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2d23a5e-391d-aa4b-e18b-8ad89066ffa2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox