Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@collabora.com>
To: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: allow volatile buffers to use ttm pool allocator
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 16:53:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f42a3dc9-2a6f-2467-b2ff-b6487669ae48@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ce81c514959e43f5afd7e74489dd5b89b1cd633.camel@linux.intel.com>



On 11/05/2022 13:42, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi, Bob,
> 
> On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 19:13 +0000, Robert Beckett wrote:
>> internal buffers should be shmem backed.
>> if a volatile buffer is requested, allow ttm to use the pool
>> allocator
>> to provide volatile pages as backing
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> index 4c25d9b2f138..fdb3a1c18cb6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
>> @@ -309,7 +309,8 @@ static struct ttm_tt *i915_ttm_tt_create(struct
>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>                  page_flags |= TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC;
>>   
>>          caching = i915_ttm_select_tt_caching(obj);
>> -       if (i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj) && caching ==
>> ttm_cached) {
>> +       if (i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj) && caching ==
>> ttm_cached &&
>> +           !i915_gem_object_is_volatile(obj)) {
>>                  page_flags |= TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL |
>>                                TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL_MAPPABLE;
>>                  i915_tt->is_shmem = true;
> 
> While this is ok, I think it also needs adjustment in the i915_ttm
> shrink callback. If someone creates a volatile smem object which then
> hits the shrinker, I think we might hit asserts that it's a is_shem
> ttm?
> 
> In this case, the shrink callback should just i915_ttm_purge().

agreed. nice catch.
I'll fix for v2

looks like we could maybe do with some extra shrinker testing too? looks 
like nothing caught this during CI testing

> 
> /Thomas
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-03 19:13 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] ttm for internal Robert Beckett
2022-05-03 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: add gen6 ppgtt dummy creation function Robert Beckett
2022-05-11 10:13   ` Thomas Hellström
2022-05-23 15:52     ` Robert Beckett
2022-05-03 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: setup ggtt scratch page after memory regions Robert Beckett
2022-05-11 11:24   ` Thomas Hellström
2022-05-03 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: allow volatile buffers to use ttm pool allocator Robert Beckett
2022-05-11 12:42   ` Thomas Hellström
2022-05-23 15:53     ` Robert Beckett [this message]
2022-05-03 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: internal buffers use ttm backend Robert Beckett
2022-05-11 14:14   ` Thomas Hellström
2022-05-23 15:52     ` Robert Beckett
2022-05-03 19:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for ttm for internal Patchwork
2022-05-06  3:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for ttm for internal (rev2) Patchwork
2022-05-10 21:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for ttm for internal (rev3) Patchwork
2022-05-11  2:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f42a3dc9-2a6f-2467-b2ff-b6487669ae48@collabora.com \
    --to=bob.beckett@collabora.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox