From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Unset enable_psr2_sel_fetch if other checks in intel_psr2_config_valid() fails
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 07:29:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4575ddb442310862ac1cba5b9a24999dc11ef1d.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412205527.174685-1-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 13:55 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> If any of the PSR2 checks after intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
> fails, enable_psr2_sel_fetch will be kept enabled causing problems
> in the functions that only checks for it and not for has_psr2.
>
> So here moving the check that do not depend on enable_psr2_sel_fetch
> and for the remaning ones jumping to a section that unset
> enable_psr2_sel_fetch in case of failure to support PSR2.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
>
> Fixes: 6e43e276b8c9 ("drm/i915: Initial implementation of PSR2
> selective fetch")
> Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 38 +++++++++++++---------
> --
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 5a55010a9b2f7..8ec7c161284be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -891,6 +891,20 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> return false;
> }
>
> + /* Wa_16011303918:adl-p */
> + if (crtc_state->vrr.enable &&
> + IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "PSR2 not enabled, not compatible with HW
> stepping + VRR\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (!_compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(intel_dp,
> crtc_state)) {
> + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> + "PSR2 not enabled, PSR2 SDP indication do
> not fit in hblank\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> if (HAS_PSR2_SEL_FETCH(dev_priv)) {
> if (!intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid(intel_dp,
> crtc_state) &&
> !HAS_PSR_HW_TRACKING(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -904,12 +918,12 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> if (!crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch &&
> IS_TGL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_C0)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 HW tracking is not
> supported this Display stepping\n");
> - return false;
> + goto unsupported;
> }
>
> if (!psr2_granularity_check(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "PSR2 not enabled, SU
> granularity not compatible\n");
> - return false;
> + goto unsupported;
> }
>
> if (!crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch &&
> @@ -918,25 +932,15 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> "PSR2 not enabled, resolution %dx%d > max
> supported %dx%d\n",
> crtc_hdisplay, crtc_vdisplay,
> psr_max_h, psr_max_v);
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - if (!_compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(intel_dp,
> crtc_state)) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "PSR2 not enabled, PSR2 SDP indication do
> not fit in hblank\n");
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - /* Wa_16011303918:adl-p */
> - if (crtc_state->vrr.enable &&
> - IS_ADLP_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0)) {
> - drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> - "PSR2 not enabled, not compatible with HW
> stepping + VRR\n");
> - return false;
> + goto unsupported;
> }
>
> tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> return true;
> +
> +unsupported:
> + crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch = false;
> + return false;
> }
>
> void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-12 20:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Unset enable_psr2_sel_fetch if other checks in intel_psr2_config_valid() fails José Roberto de Souza
2022-04-12 20:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Clear more PSR state during disable José Roberto de Souza
2022-04-13 7:27 ` Hogander, Jouni
2022-04-13 15:59 ` Souza, Jose
2022-04-14 11:08 ` Hogander, Jouni
2022-04-14 13:01 ` Souza, Jose
2022-04-13 7:29 ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2022-04-13 15:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/display/psr: Unset enable_psr2_sel_fetch if other checks in intel_psr2_config_valid() fails Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4575ddb442310862ac1cba5b9a24999dc11ef1d.camel@intel.com \
--to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox