public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 4.10-rc2 oops in DRM connector code
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 08:50:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f56df02a-61ae-e20b-c99a-cfe8ccd45c64@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEjjmD=Aq5=DC2QmjX2V8PCwwF2hd6N4Ma_oreY_C8iFw@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/09/2017 08:41 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>> Well, now I found where the -2 comes from.
>> intel_dp_register_mst_connector() calls drm_connector_register(), which
>> fails to add the kobject (warning below).  But, it does zero error
>> checking on the drm_connector_register() call and leaves the
>> partially-constructed connector in place.
>>
>> The next time some poor, hapless code goes and tries to do anything with
>> that kdev, they oops.  I'm perplexed by this, though.  The
>> drm_dp_mst_topology_cbs->register_connector just returns void.  It seems
>> a bit goofy that it can't even _return_ failure.
>>
>> Is there some stable code to go back to here?  Or, is there something
>> about my configuration that's unique?  I really wonder why nobody else
>> is running into this.
>>
>> There's probably some other race going on here.  This warning doesn't
>> happen on every boot.
> This smells more like the root-cause: Something goes wrong on boot
> that prevents connectors from properly registering, then we fall over
> later on. And the register callback is intentionally void, assuming
> that any prep work has been done earlier and that therefore the
> register step can't fail. Can you pls check whether the oops later on
> only happens together with this warning at boot, or whether they're
> not correlated?

Looking through my logs, I can't find any instance of the oops without
the warning at boot.  So I do think the later oops is entirely caused by
the issue warned about in early boot.

My distro kernel (4.4.0-57-generic) is also unstable, but I haven't
managed to capture a good oops there.  It's hitting this, which I assume
is unrelated:

	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 41 at /build/linux-lts-xenial-FdAdUy/linux-
	lts-xenial-4.4.0/ubuntu/i915/intel_pm.c:3675
	skl_update_other_pipe_wm+0x191/0x1a0 [i915_bpo]()

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-05 19:03 4.10-rc2 oops in DRM connector code Dave Hansen
2017-01-05 19:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-01-09 10:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-09 12:59   ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 13:40   ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 13:46     ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 16:41     ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-09 16:50       ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2017-01-09 16:59         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-01-09 17:22           ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-09 19:34             ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2017-01-09 17:42           ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-10 10:31             ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-01-10 16:52               ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-11  7:43                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-01-11 15:24                   ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-11 15:39                     ` Daniel Vetter
2017-01-11 16:16                       ` Dave Hansen
2017-01-11 22:25                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2017-01-11 15:40                     ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-11 20:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for 4.10-rc2 oops in DRM connector code (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f56df02a-61ae-e20b-c99a-cfe8ccd45c64@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox