From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/ttm: Fix incorrect assumptions about ttm_bo_validate() semantics
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:07:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc17611c-7ac2-87de-a039-4b1a7b4b8fa0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162401200861.1292.1141140048329292644@emeril.freedesktop.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1689 bytes --]
On 6/18/21 12:26 PM, Patchwork wrote:
> Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details*
> *Series:* drm/i915/ttm: Fix incorrect assumptions about
> ttm_bo_validate() semantics
> *URL:* https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91661/
> <https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/91661/>
> *State:* failure
> *Details:*
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/index.html
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/index.html>
>
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10242_full -> Patchwork_20407_full
>
>
> Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_20407_full absolutely
> need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_20407_full, please notify your bug team to
> allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
> in CI.
>
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_20407_full:
>
>
> IGT changes
>
>
> Possible regressions
>
> *
>
> igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@vcs1:
>
> o shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@vcs1.html>
> *
>
> igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-8bpp-rotate-0:
>
> o shard-glk: PASS
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10242/shard-glk3/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-8bpp-rotate-0.html>
> -> FAIL
> <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20407/shard-glk1/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-8bpp-rotate-0.html>
>
Failures not related AFAICT.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3113 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 8:31 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ttm: Fix incorrect assumptions about ttm_bo_validate() semantics Thomas Hellström
2021-06-18 9:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2021-06-18 10:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-06-18 12:07 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2021-06-18 10:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Matthew Auld
2021-06-18 12:41 ` Thomas Hellström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc17611c-7ac2-87de-a039-4b1a7b4b8fa0@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox