Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Ruiqi GONG <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uc: Fix undefined behavior due to shift overflowing the constant
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:08:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fecf0889-c10b-3034-91d3-68add9cc9db1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518113315.1305027-2-jani.nikula@intel.com>



On 18.05.2022 13:33, Jani Nikula wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> 
> Fix:
> 
>   In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c: In function ‘intel_guc_send_mmio’:
>   ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:352:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1047’ \
>   declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: mask is not constant
>     _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> 
> and other build errors due to shift overflowing values.
> 
> See https://lore.kernel.org/r/YkwQ6%2BtIH8GQpuct@zn.tnic for the gory
> details as to why it triggers with older gccs only.
> 
> v2 by Jani:
> - Drop the i915_reg.h changes
> 
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ruiqi GONG <gongruiqi1@huawei.com>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h           | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_messages_abi.h          | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h                 | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> index be9ac47fa9d0..4ef9990ed7f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>  
>  #define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_LEN		(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_MIN_LEN + 3u)
>  #define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_0_MBZ		GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0
> -#define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_1_KLV_KEY		(0xffff << 16)
> +#define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_1_KLV_KEY		(0xffffU << 16)

nit: maybe for consistency we should update all these hex constants to
be explicitly marked as "unsigned" (as that was the intention) and also
maybe we should use lowercase "u" - but both that can be done later,

Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

>  #define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_1_KLV_LEN		(0xffff << 0)
>  #define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_2_VALUE32		GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_n_DATAn
>  #define HOST2GUC_SELF_CFG_REQUEST_MSG_3_VALUE64		GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_n_DATAn
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
> index c9086a600bce..df83c1cc7c7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static_assert(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc) == 64);
>  #define GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN				1u
>  #define GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN			GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN
>  #define GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN			256u
> -#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE			(0xffff << 16)
> +#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE			(0xffffU << 16)
>  #define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT			(0xf << 12)
>  #define   GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG			0u
>  #define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_RESERVED			(0xf << 8)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_messages_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_messages_abi.h
> index 29ac823acd4c..7d5ba4d97d70 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_messages_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_messages_abi.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #define GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN			1u
> -#define GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN			(0x1 << 31)
> +#define GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN			(0x1U << 31)
>  #define   GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST			0u
>  #define   GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC			1u
>  #define GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE			(0x7 << 28)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
> index 2516705b9f36..8dc063f087eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  #define   GS_MIA_HALT_REQUESTED		  (0x02 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
>  #define   GS_MIA_ISR_ENTRY		  (0x04 << GS_MIA_SHIFT)
>  #define   GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT		30
> -#define   GS_AUTH_STATUS_MASK		  (0x03 << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
> +#define   GS_AUTH_STATUS_MASK		  (0x03U << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
>  #define   GS_AUTH_STATUS_BAD		  (0x01 << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
>  #define   GS_AUTH_STATUS_GOOD		  (0x02 << GS_AUTH_STATUS_SHIFT)
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-18 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 11:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/reg: fix undefined behavior due to shift overflowing the constant Jani Nikula
2022-05-18 11:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/uc: Fix " Jani Nikula
2022-05-18 14:08   ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2022-05-18 14:15     ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-19  8:38       ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-18 12:53 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/reg: fix " Ville Syrjälä
2022-05-18 13:52   ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-19  8:25     ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-18 13:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/2] " Patchwork
2022-05-18 14:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-05-18 17:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fecf0889-c10b-3034-91d3-68add9cc9db1@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=gongruiqi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox