From: "Michal Wajdeczko" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/error: standardize function style in error capture
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 10:48:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.zff76ogdxaggs7@mwajdecz-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180305222122.3547-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
On Mon, 05 Mar 2018 23:21:21 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
<daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> wrote:
> some of the static functions used from capture() have the "i915_"
> prefix while other don't; most of them take i915 as a parameter, but one
> of them derives it internally from error->i915. Let's be consistent by
> avoiding prefix for static functions and by getting i915 from
> error->i915. While at it, s/dev_priv/i915 in functions that don't
> perform register reads.
>
> v2: take i915 from error->i915 (Michal), s/dev_priv/i915,
> update commit message
>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 84
> ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index ef29fb48d6d9..9afb1b9674c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -1084,9 +1084,9 @@ static uint32_t i915_error_generate_code(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return error_code;
> }
> -static void i915_gem_record_fences(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> +static void gem_record_fences(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
hmm, as we drop i915 prefix then maybe we should start all static functions
with the verb, so s/gem_record_fences/record_gem_fences ?
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = error->i915;
> int i;
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
> @@ -1424,14 +1424,14 @@ capture_object(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
> }
> -static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> +static void gem_record_rings(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> {
> - struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = error->i915;
> + struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &i915->ggtt;
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
> - struct intel_engine_cs *engine = dev_priv->engine[i];
> + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = i915->engine[i];
> struct drm_i915_error_engine *ee = &error->engine[i];
> struct i915_request *request;
> @@ -1460,17 +1460,16 @@ static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> * by userspace.
> */
> ee->batchbuffer =
> - i915_error_object_create(dev_priv,
> - request->batch);
> + i915_error_object_create(i915, request->batch);
> - if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev_priv))
> + if (HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(i915))
> ee->wa_batchbuffer =
> - i915_error_object_create(dev_priv,
> + i915_error_object_create(i915,
> engine->scratch);
> request_record_user_bo(request, ee);
> ee->ctx =
> - i915_error_object_create(dev_priv,
> + i915_error_object_create(i915,
> request->ctx->engine[i].state);
> error->simulated |=
> @@ -1484,27 +1483,24 @@ static void i915_gem_record_rings(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> ee->cpu_ring_head = ring->head;
> ee->cpu_ring_tail = ring->tail;
> ee->ringbuffer =
> - i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, ring->vma);
> + i915_error_object_create(i915, ring->vma);
> engine_record_requests(engine, request, ee);
> }
> ee->hws_page =
> - i915_error_object_create(dev_priv,
> + i915_error_object_create(i915,
> engine->status_page.vma);
> - ee->wa_ctx =
> - i915_error_object_create(dev_priv, engine->wa_ctx.vma);
> + ee->wa_ctx = i915_error_object_create(i915, engine->wa_ctx.vma);
> - ee->default_state =
> - capture_object(dev_priv, engine->default_state);
> + ee->default_state = capture_object(i915, engine->default_state);
> }
> }
> -static void i915_gem_capture_vm(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error,
> - struct i915_address_space *vm,
> - int idx)
> +static void gem_capture_vm(struct i915_gpu_state *error,
> + struct i915_address_space *vm,
> + int idx)
same here, s/gem_capture_vm/capture_gem_vm ?
> {
> struct drm_i915_error_buffer *active_bo;
> struct i915_vma *vma;
> @@ -1527,8 +1523,7 @@ static void i915_gem_capture_vm(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> error->active_bo_count[idx] = count;
> }
> -static void i915_capture_active_buffers(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> +static void capture_active_buffers(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> {
> int cnt = 0, i, j;
> @@ -1548,14 +1543,13 @@ static void i915_capture_active_buffers(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> for (j = 0; j < i && !found; j++)
> found = error->engine[j].vm == ee->vm;
> if (!found)
> - i915_gem_capture_vm(dev_priv, error, ee->vm, cnt++);
> + gem_capture_vm(error, ee->vm, cnt++);
> }
> }
> -static void i915_capture_pinned_buffers(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> +static void capture_pinned_buffers(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> {
> - struct i915_address_space *vm = &dev_priv->ggtt.base;
> + struct i915_address_space *vm = &error->i915->ggtt.base;
> struct drm_i915_error_buffer *bo;
> struct i915_vma *vma;
> int count_inactive, count_active;
> @@ -1605,9 +1599,9 @@ static void capture_uc_state(struct i915_gpu_state
> *error)
> }
> /* Capture all registers which don't fit into another category. */
> -static void i915_capture_reg_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> +static void capture_reg_state(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = error->i915;
> int i;
> /* General organization
> @@ -1704,24 +1698,25 @@ static void i915_error_capture_msg(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> engine_mask ? "reset" : "continue");
> }
> -static void i915_capture_gen_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> +static void capture_gen_state(struct i915_gpu_state *error)
> {
> - error->awake = dev_priv->gt.awake;
> - error->wakelock = atomic_read(&dev_priv->runtime_pm.wakeref_count);
> - error->suspended = dev_priv->runtime_pm.suspended;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = error->i915;
> +
> + error->awake = i915->gt.awake;
> + error->wakelock = atomic_read(&i915->runtime_pm.wakeref_count);
> + error->suspended = i915->runtime_pm.suspended;
> error->iommu = -1;
> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU
> error->iommu = intel_iommu_gfx_mapped;
> #endif
> - error->reset_count = i915_reset_count(&dev_priv->gpu_error);
> - error->suspend_count = dev_priv->suspend_count;
> + error->reset_count = i915_reset_count(&i915->gpu_error);
> + error->suspend_count = i915->suspend_count;
> memcpy(&error->device_info,
> - INTEL_INFO(dev_priv),
> + INTEL_INFO(i915),
> sizeof(error->device_info));
> - error->driver_caps = dev_priv->caps;
> + error->driver_caps = i915->caps;
> }
> static __always_inline void dup_param(const char *type, void *x)
> @@ -1749,13 +1744,12 @@ static int capture(void *data)
> capture_params(error);
> capture_uc_state(error);
> -
> - i915_capture_gen_state(error->i915, error);
> - i915_capture_reg_state(error->i915, error);
> - i915_gem_record_fences(error->i915, error);
> - i915_gem_record_rings(error->i915, error);
> - i915_capture_active_buffers(error->i915, error);
> - i915_capture_pinned_buffers(error->i915, error);
> + capture_gen_state(error);
> + capture_reg_state(error);
> + gem_record_fences(error);
> + gem_record_rings(error);
> + capture_active_buffers(error);
> + capture_pinned_buffers(error);
> error->overlay = intel_overlay_capture_error_state(error->i915);
> error->display = intel_display_capture_error_state(error->i915);
also, it looks that we are not consistent in using capture vs. record
verb...
but cleanup of all above nitpicks can be continued in another spin, so
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-06 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-05 22:21 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/error: remove unused gen8_engine_sync_index Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-03-05 22:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/error: standardize function style in error capture Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-03-06 1:23 ` Michel Thierry
2018-03-06 9:22 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-06 9:48 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2018-03-06 10:00 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-05 22:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/error: capture uc_state after gen_state Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-03-06 9:23 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-06 9:36 ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-05 22:44 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/error: remove unused gen8_engine_sync_index Patchwork
2018-03-06 6:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.zff76ogdxaggs7@mwajdecz-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox