From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Javier MV" <javiermv@gmail.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/guc: Don't unblock a banned context
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 13:07:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207084@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110122534.12989-3-javiermv@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] drm/i915/guc: context_cant_unblock() misses exiting contexts
on unblock
--
commit f3c1b0cc59baf35aaa07862b720ef5529fd5baed
Author: Javier MV <javiermv@duck.com>
drm/i915/guc: Don't unblock a banned context
This commit adds an intel_context_is_banned() check to
context_cant_unblock() so that guc_context_unblock() does not re-enable
scheduling on a banned context after the schedule-disable done handler
clears SCHED_STATE_BANNED.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/15301
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 555ca8fdf64af..eb1d010ed3dcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -3182,7 +3182,12 @@ static bool context_cant_unblock(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&ce->guc_state.lock);
>
> + /*
> + * SCHED_STATE_BANNED alone isn't enough: the sched disable done
> + * handler clears it.
> + */
> return (ce->guc_state.sched_state & SCHED_STATE_NO_UNBLOCK) ||
> + intel_context_is_banned(ce) ||
> context_guc_id_invalid(ce) ||
> !ctx_id_mapped(ce_to_guc(ce), ce->guc_id.id) ||
> !intel_context_is_pinned(ce);
[Severity: Medium]
Should this check !intel_context_is_schedulable(ce) instead of
intel_context_is_banned(ce)?
intel_context_revoke() sets CONTEXT_EXITING (not CONTEXT_BANNED) via
intel_context_set_exiting() before calling guc_context_revoke(), which
then takes the same SCHED_STATE_BANNED path as a banned context. If
intel_context_revoke() (for example on context close or process exit for
a non-persistent context) races with guc_context_cancel_request() while
the block schedule-disable is pending, intel_guc_sched_done_process_msg()
clears SCHED_STATE_BANNED and cancels the inflight requests with -EIO.
When guc_context_cancel_request() resumes, guc_reset_state() sees
!intel_context_is_schedulable(ce) and returns early without scrubbing the
LRC or advancing the ring head, and then guc_context_unblock() re-enables
scheduling in GuC for the revoked context with an un-scrubbed ring and
already-completed requests.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110122534.12989-1-javiermv@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 12:24 [PATCH 0/2] drm/i915/guc: Fix requests of a banned context never completing Javier MV
2026-11-10 12:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/guc: Complete all requests of a non-schedulable context Javier MV
2026-11-10 12:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/guc: Don't unblock a banned context Javier MV
2026-11-10 13:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 15:11 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for drm/i915/guc: Fix requests of a banned context never completing Patchwork
2026-11-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Javier MV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207084@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=javiermv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox