From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Give up on edid retries when i2c tells us that bus is not there
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:41:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yunbotfxmtt.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC7LmnvHHmjo_PnZtWhmr+bNCSq=6cYbe8hTZMHjdXnCymU38Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 439 bytes --]
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:07:51 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net> wrote:
> From what I've checked, the other return error value in this context could
> be -EREMOTEIO, which could be caused by transmission error so it should be
> retried.
Oh, there's -ENOMEM, -EINVAL and probably a few others down in the
bowels of the kernel i2c bits. Starting with the obvious (ENXIO) seems
safest to me.
--
keith.packard@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 13:12 [PATCH] Improvements in edid detection timings (final) Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-17 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Give up on edid retries when i2c tells us that bus is not there Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-17 20:41 ` Keith Packard
2011-10-17 21:07 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-17 22:41 ` Keith Packard [this message]
2011-10-18 0:06 ` Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-31 19:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2011-10-17 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] Check if the bus is valid prior to discovering edid Eugeni Dodonov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-07 22:00 [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Potential improvements in edid detection timings (v2) Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-07 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] Give up on edid retries when i2c tells us that bus is not there Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-06 23:30 [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Potential improvements in edid detection timings Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-06 23:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] Give up on edid retries when i2c tells us that bus is not there Eugeni Dodonov
2011-10-07 14:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-10-07 14:11 ` Eugeni Dodonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yunbotfxmtt.fsf@aiko.keithp.com \
--to=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=eugeni.dodonov@intel.com \
--cc=eugeni@dodonov.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox