Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 03/12] net: igb: avoid using timespec
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 22:01:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1803983.ImzkvzgWES@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151001191745.GC1872@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 01 October 2015 21:17:45 Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 01:26:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
> > index 5982f28d521a..c44df87c38de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c
> > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void igb_ptp_write_i210(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
> >        * sub-nanosecond resolution.
> >        */
> >       wr32(E1000_SYSTIML, ts->tv_nsec);
> > -     wr32(E1000_SYSTIMH, ts->tv_sec);
> > +     wr32(E1000_SYSTIMH, (u32)ts->tv_sec);
> 
> This cast is unnecessary, because wr32 is writel, and that parameter
> is a u32.

I tried to use this pattern whenever I convert the 64-bit 'long long'
tv_sec member of 'struct timespec64' into a 32-bit number, to annotate
the loss of range.

I have thought about defining separate helpers like this

/* result will overflow in 2038 for real time */
static inline s32 time64_to_s32_y2038(time64_t time)
{
	return time;
}

/* result will overflow in 2106 for real time */
static inline u32 time64_to_u32_y2106(time64_t time)
{
	return time;
}

/* monotonic times can safely be represented as 32 bit */
static inline s32 time64_to_s32_monotonic(time64_t time)
{
	return time;
}

This would make it even more explicit, but my fear was that I was
adding too much complexity like that.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-01 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-30 11:26 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 00/12] net: assorted y2038 changes Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-30 11:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 03/12] net: igb: avoid using timespec Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-01 19:17   ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-01 20:01     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-10-02  7:47       ` Richard Cochran
2015-10-05 10:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 00/12] net: assorted y2038 changes David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1803983.ImzkvzgWES@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox