From: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 8/9] ixgbevf: improve performance and reduce size of ixgbevf_tx_map()
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:37:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211183725.21524.40905.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211183537.21524.10133.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>
Based on commit ec718254cbfe
("ixgbe: Improve performance and reduce size of ixgbe_tx_map")
This change is meant to both improve the performance and reduce the size of
ixgbevf_tx_map().
Expand the work done in the main loop by pushing first into tx_buffer.
This allows us to pull in the dma_mapping_error check, the tx_buffer value
assignment, and the initial DMA value assignment to the Tx descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Emil Tantilov <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 45 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index a793f9e..d3415ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -3532,34 +3532,37 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
struct ixgbevf_tx_buffer *first,
const u8 hdr_len)
{
- dma_addr_t dma;
struct sk_buff *skb = first->skb;
struct ixgbevf_tx_buffer *tx_buffer;
union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc;
- struct skb_frag_struct *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0];
- unsigned int data_len = skb->data_len;
- unsigned int size = skb_headlen(skb);
- unsigned int paylen = skb->len - hdr_len;
+ struct skb_frag_struct *frag;
+ dma_addr_t dma;
+ unsigned int data_len, size;
u32 tx_flags = first->tx_flags;
- __le32 cmd_type;
+ __le32 cmd_type = ixgbevf_tx_cmd_type(tx_flags);
u16 i = tx_ring->next_to_use;
tx_desc = IXGBEVF_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i);
- ixgbevf_tx_olinfo_status(tx_desc, tx_flags, paylen);
- cmd_type = ixgbevf_tx_cmd_type(tx_flags);
+ ixgbevf_tx_olinfo_status(tx_desc, tx_flags, skb->len - hdr_len);
+
+ size = skb_headlen(skb);
+ data_len = skb->data_len;
dma = dma_map_single(tx_ring->dev, skb->data, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- if (dma_mapping_error(tx_ring->dev, dma))
- goto dma_error;
- /* record length, and DMA address */
- dma_unmap_len_set(first, len, size);
- dma_unmap_addr_set(first, dma, dma);
+ tx_buffer = first;
- tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
+ for (frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0];; frag++) {
+ if (dma_mapping_error(tx_ring->dev, dma))
+ goto dma_error;
+
+ /* record length, and DMA address */
+ dma_unmap_len_set(tx_buffer, len, size);
+ dma_unmap_addr_set(tx_buffer, dma, dma);
+
+ tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
- for (;;) {
while (unlikely(size > IXGBE_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)) {
tx_desc->read.cmd_type_len =
cmd_type | cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD);
@@ -3570,12 +3573,12 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
tx_desc = IXGBEVF_TX_DESC(tx_ring, 0);
i = 0;
}
+ tx_desc->read.olinfo_status = 0;
dma += IXGBE_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD;
size -= IXGBE_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD;
tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
- tx_desc->read.olinfo_status = 0;
}
if (likely(!data_len))
@@ -3589,23 +3592,15 @@ static void ixgbevf_tx_map(struct ixgbevf_ring *tx_ring,
tx_desc = IXGBEVF_TX_DESC(tx_ring, 0);
i = 0;
}
+ tx_desc->read.olinfo_status = 0;
size = skb_frag_size(frag);
data_len -= size;
dma = skb_frag_dma_map(tx_ring->dev, frag, 0, size,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
- if (dma_mapping_error(tx_ring->dev, dma))
- goto dma_error;
tx_buffer = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[i];
- dma_unmap_len_set(tx_buffer, len, size);
- dma_unmap_addr_set(tx_buffer, dma, dma);
-
- tx_desc->read.buffer_addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
- tx_desc->read.olinfo_status = 0;
-
- frag++;
}
/* write last descriptor with RS and EOP bits */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-11 18:36 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/9] ixgbevf: update Rx/Tx code path for build_skb Emil Tantilov
2017-12-11 18:36 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/9] ixgbevf: add function for checking if we can reuse page Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:41 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:36 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/9] ixgbevf: only DMA sync frame length Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:43 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:55 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:36 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 3/9] ixgbevf: use length to determine if descriptor is done Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:44 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:57 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/9] ixgbevf: add support for DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC/WEAK_ORDERING Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:46 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:54 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 5/9] ixgbevf: update code to better handle incrementing page count Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:46 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:56 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 6/9] ixgbevf: add counters for Rx page allocations Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:47 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:54 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 7/9] ixgbevf: clear rx_buffer_info in configure instead of clean Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:48 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:55 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:37 ` Emil Tantilov [this message]
2018-01-04 15:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 8/9] ixgbevf: improve performance and reduce size of ixgbevf_tx_map() Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:54 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2017-12-11 18:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 9/9] ixgbevf: don't bother clearing tx_buffer_info in ixgbevf_clean_tx_ring() Emil Tantilov
2018-01-04 15:50 ` Singh, Krishneil K
2018-02-26 15:57 ` Singh, Krishneil K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211183725.21524.40905.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox