From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 4/5] net: use the new dev_page_is_reusable() instead of private versions
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:52:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204115220.0000018d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202133030.5760-5-alobakin@pm.me>
Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Now we can remove a bunch of identical functions from the drivers and
> make them use common dev_page_is_reusable(). All {,un}likely() checks
> are omitted since it's already present in this helper.
> Also update some comments near the call sites.
>
> Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
I don't know why it was missed in the series update, but:
Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 13:30 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 0/5] net: consolidate page_is_pfmemalloc() usage Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-02 13:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 1/5] mm: constify page_is_pfmemalloc() argument Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-02 13:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 2/5] skbuff: constify skb_propagate_pfmemalloc() "page" argument Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-02 13:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 3/5] net: introduce common dev_page_is_reusable() Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-02 13:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 4/5] net: use the new dev_page_is_reusable() instead of private versions Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-04 19:52 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
2021-02-02 13:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 5/5] net: page_pool: simplify page recycling condition tests Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-05 2:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH RESEND v3 net-next 0/5] net: consolidate page_is_pfmemalloc() usage patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210204115220.0000018d@intel.com \
--to=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox