From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v2 net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETSYNCESTATE message to get SyncE status
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 08:10:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210829151017.GA6016@hoboy.vegasvil.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210829080512.3573627-2-maciej.machnikowski@intel.com>
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 10:05:11AM +0200, Maciej Machnikowski wrote:
> This patch adds the new RTM_GETSYNCESTATE message to query the status
> of SyncE syntonization on the device.
>
> Initial implementation returns:
> - SyncE DPLL state
> - Source of signal driving SyncE DPLL (SyncE, GNSS, PTP or External)
> - Current index of Pin driving the DPLL
>
> SyncE state read needs to be implemented as ndo_get_synce_state function.
>
> This patch is SyncE-oriented. Future implementation can add additional
> functionality for reading different DPLL states using the same structure.
I would call this more "ice oriented" than SyncE oriented. I'm not
sure there is even such a thing as "SyncE DPLL". Does that term come
from 802.3? To my understanding, that is one just way of implementing
it that works on super-Gigabit speed devices.
I have nothing against exposing the DPLL if you need to, however I'd
like to have an interface that support plain Gigabit as well. This
could be done in a generic way by offering Control Register 9 as
described in 802.3.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-29 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-29 8:05 [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v2 net-next 0/2] Add RTNL interface for SyncE Maciej Machnikowski
2021-08-29 8:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v2 net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETSYNCESTATE message to get SyncE status Maciej Machnikowski
2021-08-29 15:10 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2021-08-29 16:42 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-08-29 20:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-08-30 20:57 ` Richard Cochran
2021-08-30 23:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-31 10:20 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-08-31 13:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-31 14:07 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-08-31 14:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-31 15:19 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-08-31 15:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-31 16:00 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-08-31 16:19 ` Richard Cochran
2021-08-31 22:09 ` Machnikowski, Maciej
2021-09-01 2:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-01 2:56 ` Richard Cochran
2021-09-01 1:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-01 2:55 ` Richard Cochran
2021-08-29 8:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC v2 net-next 2/2] ice: add support for reading SyncE DPLL state Maciej Machnikowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210829151017.GA6016@hoboy.vegasvil.org \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox