From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 0/8] Be explicit with XFRM offload direction
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 09:28:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220507072835.GI680067@gauss3.secunet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1651743750.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:06:37PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Hi Steffen,
>
> I may admit that the title of this series is not the best one as it
> contains straightforward cleanups and code that converts flags to
> something less confusing.
>
> This series follows removal of FPGA IPsec code from the mlx5 driver and
> based on net-next commit 4950b6990e3b ("Merge branch 'ocelot-vcap-cleanups'").
>
> As such, first two patches delete code that was used by mlx5 FPGA code
> but isn't needed anymore.
>
> Third patch is simple struct rename.
>
> Rest of the patches separate user's provided flags variable from driver's
> usage. This allows us to created more simple in-kernel interface, that
> supports type checking without blending different properties into one
> variable. It is achieved by converting flags to specific bitfield variables
> with clear, meaningful names.
>
> Such change allows us more clear addition of new input flags needed to
> mark IPsec offload type.
>
> The followup code uses this extensively:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=xfrm-next
>
> Thanks
>
> Leon Romanovsky (8):
> xfrm: free not used XFRM_ESP_NO_TRAILER flag
> xfrm: delete not used number of external headers
> xfrm: rename xfrm_state_offload struct to allow reuse
> xfrm: store and rely on direction to construct offload flags
> ixgbe: propagate XFRM offload state direction instead of flags
> netdevsim: rely on XFRM state direction instead of flags
> net/mlx5e: Use XFRM state direction instead of flags
> xfrm: drop not needed flags variable in XFRM offload struct
Series applied, thanks a lot Leon!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-07 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-05 10:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 0/8] Be explicit with XFRM offload direction Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 1/8] xfrm: free not used XFRM_ESP_NO_TRAILER flag Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 11:02 ` David Miller
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 2/8] xfrm: delete not used number of external headers Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 11:03 ` David Miller
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 3/8] xfrm: rename xfrm_state_offload struct to allow reuse Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 11:03 ` David Miller
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 4/8] xfrm: store and rely on direction to construct offload flags Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 5/8] ixgbe: propagate XFRM offload state direction instead of flags Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 6/8] netdevsim: rely on XFRM " Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 16:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 7/8] net/mlx5e: Use " Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-05 10:06 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH ipsec-next 8/8] xfrm: drop not needed flags variable in XFRM offload struct Leon Romanovsky
2022-05-07 7:28 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220507072835.GI680067@gauss3.secunet.de \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox