From: Mateusz Palczewski <mateusz.palczewski@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: Michal Jaron <michalx.jaron@intel.com>,
Slawomir Laba <slawomirx.laba@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v1 1/2] i40e: Fix ethtool rx-flow-hash setting for X722
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 09:43:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704074359.1221497-1-mateusz.palczewski@intel.com> (raw)
From: Michal Jaron <michalx.jaron@intel.com>
When enabling flow type for RSS hash via ethtool:
ethtool -N $pf rx-flow-hash tcp4|tcp6|udp4|udp6 s|d
the driver would fail to setup this setting on X722
device since it was using the mask on the register
dedicated for X710 devices.
Implement a bitmap to collect the flow pc types that
shall be applied on the inset and hena registers.
Apply a different mask on the register when setting the
RSS hash for the X722 device.
When displaying the flow types enabled via ethtool:
ethtool -n $pf rx-flow-hash tcp4|tcp6|udp4|udp6
the driver would print wrong values for X722 device.
Fix this issue by testing masks for X722 device in
i40e_get_rss_hash_opts function.
Fixes: eb0dd6e4a3b3 (i40e: Allow RSS Hash set with less than four parameters)
Signed-off-by: Michal Jaron <michalx.jaron@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Slawomir Laba <slawomirx.laba@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Palczewski <mateusz.palczewski@intel.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 30 ++++++++++++++-----
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h | 4 +++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
index 19704f5c8291..114c68598e41 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
@@ -3098,10 +3098,17 @@ static int i40e_get_rss_hash_opts(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct ethtool_rxnfc *cmd)
if (cmd->flow_type == TCP_V4_FLOW ||
cmd->flow_type == UDP_V4_FLOW) {
- if (i_set & I40E_L3_SRC_MASK)
- cmd->data |= RXH_IP_SRC;
- if (i_set & I40E_L3_DST_MASK)
- cmd->data |= RXH_IP_DST;
+ if (hw->mac.type == I40E_MAC_X722) {
+ if (i_set & I40E_X722_L3_SRC_MASK)
+ cmd->data |= RXH_IP_SRC;
+ if (i_set & I40E_X722_L3_DST_MASK)
+ cmd->data |= RXH_IP_DST;
+ } else {
+ if (i_set & I40E_L3_SRC_MASK)
+ cmd->data |= RXH_IP_SRC;
+ if (i_set & I40E_L3_DST_MASK)
+ cmd->data |= RXH_IP_DST;
+ }
} else if (cmd->flow_type == TCP_V6_FLOW ||
cmd->flow_type == UDP_V6_FLOW) {
if (i_set & I40E_L3_V6_SRC_MASK)
@@ -3464,7 +3471,9 @@ static int i40e_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_rxnfc *cmd,
*
* Returns value of bits to be set per user request
**/
-static u64 i40e_get_rss_hash_bits(struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc, u64 i_setc)
+static u64 i40e_get_rss_hash_bits(struct i40e_hw *hw,
+ struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc,
+ u64 i_setc)
{
u64 i_set = i_setc;
u64 src_l3 = 0, dst_l3 = 0;
@@ -3483,8 +3492,13 @@ static u64 i40e_get_rss_hash_bits(struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc, u64 i_setc)
dst_l3 = I40E_L3_V6_DST_MASK;
} else if (nfc->flow_type == TCP_V4_FLOW ||
nfc->flow_type == UDP_V4_FLOW) {
- src_l3 = I40E_L3_SRC_MASK;
- dst_l3 = I40E_L3_DST_MASK;
+ if (hw->mac.type == I40E_MAC_X722) {
+ src_l3 = I40E_X722_L3_SRC_MASK;
+ dst_l3 = I40E_X722_L3_DST_MASK;
+ } else {
+ src_l3 = I40E_L3_SRC_MASK;
+ dst_l3 = I40E_L3_DST_MASK;
+ }
} else {
/* Any other flow type are not supported here */
return i_set;
@@ -3599,7 +3613,7 @@ static int i40e_set_rss_hash_opt(struct i40e_pf *pf, struct ethtool_rxnfc *nfc)
flow_pctype)) |
((u64)i40e_read_rx_ctl(hw, I40E_GLQF_HASH_INSET(1,
flow_pctype)) << 32);
- i_set = i40e_get_rss_hash_bits(nfc, i_setc);
+ i_set = i40e_get_rss_hash_bits(&pf->hw, nfc, i_setc);
i40e_write_rx_ctl(hw, I40E_GLQF_HASH_INSET(0, flow_pctype),
(u32)i_set);
i40e_write_rx_ctl(hw, I40E_GLQF_HASH_INSET(1, flow_pctype),
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h
index 7b3f30beb757..388c3d36d96a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h
@@ -1404,6 +1404,10 @@ struct i40e_lldp_variables {
#define I40E_PFQF_CTL_0_HASHLUTSIZE_512 0x00010000
/* INPUT SET MASK for RSS, flow director, and flexible payload */
+#define I40E_X722_L3_SRC_SHIFT 49
+#define I40E_X722_L3_SRC_MASK (0x3ULL << I40E_X722_L3_SRC_SHIFT)
+#define I40E_X722_L3_DST_SHIFT 41
+#define I40E_X722_L3_DST_MASK (0x3ULL << I40E_X722_L3_DST_SHIFT)
#define I40E_L3_SRC_SHIFT 47
#define I40E_L3_SRC_MASK (0x3ULL << I40E_L3_SRC_SHIFT)
#define I40E_L3_V6_SRC_SHIFT 43
--
2.27.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 7:43 Mateusz Palczewski [this message]
2022-07-11 23:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v1 1/2] i40e: Fix ethtool rx-flow-hash setting for X722 Tony Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220704074359.1221497-1-mateusz.palczewski@intel.com \
--to=mateusz.palczewski@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=michalx.jaron@intel.com \
--cc=slawomirx.laba@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox