* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6
[not found] <20230829150539.6f998d1f@kernel.org>
@ 2023-08-30 20:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-09-01 16:45 ` Jesse Brandeburg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2023-08-30 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev-driver-reviewers
A minor follow up / question.
Would it be helpful to generate these kind of stats scoped to
particular companies?
Very few people end up in the top 12. It may not be entirely trivial
to run these scripts locally because people use their non-company
addresses at times. And because of GDPR and data privacy concerns
I don't want to upload raw results to GitHub or some such :(
The best idea I could come up with was to post the stats
to a per-company ML. Intel has the "wired" list which is
a perfect fit. That way the result is accessible to developers,
and they can refer to it in the "performance review" or
whenever they want to get credit for upstream reviews? :)
Does that sound sensible?
Please don't hesitate to LMK either on or off list.
Particularly if you think this is a bad idea.
And LMK if any other company wants similar stats.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6
2023-08-30 20:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6 Jakub Kicinski
@ 2023-09-01 16:45 ` Jesse Brandeburg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jesse Brandeburg @ 2023-09-01 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski, netdev; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev-driver-reviewers
On 8/30/2023 1:32 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> A minor follow up / question.
>
> Would it be helpful to generate these kind of stats scoped to
> particular companies?
>
> Very few people end up in the top 12. It may not be entirely trivial
> to run these scripts locally because people use their non-company
> addresses at times. And because of GDPR and data privacy concerns
> I don't want to upload raw results to GitHub or some such :(
>
> The best idea I could come up with was to post the stats
> to a per-company ML. Intel has the "wired" list which is
> a perfect fit. That way the result is accessible to developers,
> and they can refer to it in the "performance review" or
> whenever they want to get credit for upstream reviews? :)
>
> Does that sound sensible?
>
> Please don't hesitate to LMK either on or off list.
> Particularly if you think this is a bad idea.
>
> And LMK if any other company wants similar stats.
We got ours for the cycle, thank you! I think this is a great idea.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-09-01 16:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230829150539.6f998d1f@kernel.org>
2023-08-30 20:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.6 Jakub Kicinski
2023-09-01 16:45 ` Jesse Brandeburg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox