* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
@ 2026-08-03 21:06 Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 12:13 ` Jason Xing
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Willem de Bruijn @ 2026-08-03 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, joshua.a.hay,
przemyslaw.kitszel, Willem de Bruijn
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
field in a single operation.
Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
__le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
platforms.
Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
---
Changes
v1 -> v2
- add Fixes tag, Tony's Reviewed-by and Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731103137.4000876-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
index c724d429a7aa..91ca75e45463 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
@@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
{
- *(u32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
+ *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
desc->flow.qw1.rxr_bufsize = cpu_to_le16((u16)size);
desc->flow.qw1.compl_tag = cpu_to_le16(params->compl_tag);
}
--
2.55.0.629.g250fe7f194-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
2026-08-03 21:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc Willem de Bruijn
@ 2026-08-04 12:13 ` Jason Xing
2026-08-05 14:39 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-08-06 12:26 ` Marcin Szycik
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason Xing @ 2026-08-04 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willem de Bruijn
Cc: netdev, intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, joshua.a.hay,
przemyslaw.kitszel, Willem de Bruijn
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 5:08 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
> to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
> field in a single operation.
>
> Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
> __le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
> platforms.
>
> Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
2026-08-03 21:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 12:13 ` Jason Xing
@ 2026-08-05 14:39 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-08-06 12:26 ` Marcin Szycik
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Loktionov, Aleksandr @ 2026-08-05 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willem de Bruijn, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Nguyen, Anthony L,
Hay, Joshua A, Kitszel, Przemyslaw, Willem de Bruijn
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf
> Of Willem de Bruijn
> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2026 11:06 PM
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Hay, Joshua A <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>;
> Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>; Willem de Bruijn
> <willemb@google.com>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing
> cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
>
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
> to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
> field in a single operation.
>
> Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
> __le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
> platforms.
>
> Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes
> v1 -> v2
> - add Fixes tag, Tony's Reviewed-by and Cc: intel-wired-
> lan@lists.osuosl.org
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731103137.4000876-1-
> willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index c724d429a7aa..91ca75e45463 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union
> idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
> struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
> u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
> {
> - *(u32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype |
> td_cmd);
> + *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params-
> >dtype
> +| td_cmd));
> desc->flow.qw1.rxr_bufsize = cpu_to_le16((u16)size);
> desc->flow.qw1.compl_tag = cpu_to_le16(params->compl_tag); }
> --
> 2.55.0.629.g250fe7f194-goog
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
2026-08-03 21:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 12:13 ` Jason Xing
2026-08-05 14:39 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
@ 2026-08-06 12:26 ` Marcin Szycik
2026-08-06 14:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Szycik @ 2026-08-06 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willem de Bruijn, netdev
Cc: intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, joshua.a.hay,
przemyslaw.kitszel, Willem de Bruijn
On 03/08/2026 23:06, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
> to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
> field in a single operation.
>
> Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
> __le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
> platforms.
>
> Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes
> v1 -> v2
> - add Fixes tag, Tony's Reviewed-by and Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731103137.4000876-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index c724d429a7aa..91ca75e45463 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
> struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
> u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
> {
> - *(u32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
> + *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
While it technically works, I find it unreadable. Looking at this line
without reading commit msg, it looks like a bug where a 4-byte value is
written to u8 field. The intent to zero an adjacent, unrelated field is
not clear. Consider assigning these 4 fields manually, or adding a
comment/function doc.
Thanks,
Marcin
> desc->flow.qw1.rxr_bufsize = cpu_to_le16((u16)size);
> desc->flow.qw1.compl_tag = cpu_to_le16(params->compl_tag);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
2026-08-06 12:26 ` Marcin Szycik
@ 2026-08-06 14:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-06 14:32 ` Marcin Szycik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Willem de Bruijn @ 2026-08-06 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcin Szycik, Willem de Bruijn, netdev
Cc: intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, joshua.a.hay,
przemyslaw.kitszel, Willem de Bruijn
Marcin Szycik wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2026 23:06, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> >
> > idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
> > to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
> > field in a single operation.
> >
> > Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
> > __le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
> > platforms.
> >
> > Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
> > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes
> > v1 -> v2
> > - add Fixes tag, Tony's Reviewed-by and Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731103137.4000876-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> > index c724d429a7aa..91ca75e45463 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> > @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
> > struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
> > u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
> > {
> > - *(u32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
> > + *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
>
> While it technically works, I find it unreadable. Looking at this line
> without reading commit msg, it looks like a bug where a 4-byte value is
> written to u8 field. The intent to zero an adjacent, unrelated field is
> not clear. Consider assigning these 4 fields manually, or adding a
> comment/function doc.
This is a bug fix, which generally should be the smallest surgical
change only.
That said, I do agree on the style, and a follow-up for net-next will
clean that up too:
@@ -2408,7 +2410,12 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
{
- *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
+ desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
+
+ desc->flow.qw1.ts[0] = params->offload.desc_ts[0];
+ desc->flow.qw1.ts[1] = params->offload.desc_ts[1];
+ desc->flow.qw1.ts[2] = params->offload.desc_ts[2];
The fix is queued. If there is consensus, I can respin. But given that
we will clean this up in net-next properly, my preference is to keep
the minimal fix as is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
2026-08-06 14:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
@ 2026-08-06 14:32 ` Marcin Szycik
2026-08-06 15:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Szycik @ 2026-08-06 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willem de Bruijn, netdev
Cc: intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, joshua.a.hay,
przemyslaw.kitszel, Willem de Bruijn
On 06/08/2026 16:19, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Marcin Szycik wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/08/2026 23:06, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>>>
>>> idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
>>> to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
>>> field in a single operation.
>>>
>>> Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
>>> __le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
>>> platforms.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
>>> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes
>>> v1 -> v2
>>> - add Fixes tag, Tony's Reviewed-by and Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731103137.4000876-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>>> index c724d429a7aa..91ca75e45463 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
>>> @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
>>> struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
>>> u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
>>> {
>>> - *(u32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
>>> + *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
>>
>> While it technically works, I find it unreadable. Looking at this line
>> without reading commit msg, it looks like a bug where a 4-byte value is
>> written to u8 field. The intent to zero an adjacent, unrelated field is
>> not clear. Consider assigning these 4 fields manually, or adding a
>> comment/function doc.
>
> This is a bug fix, which generally should be the smallest surgical
> change only.
Agreed.
> That said, I do agree on the style, and a follow-up for net-next will
> clean that up too:
>
> @@ -2408,7 +2410,12 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
> struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
> u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
> {
> - *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
> + desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
> +
> + desc->flow.qw1.ts[0] = params->offload.desc_ts[0];
> + desc->flow.qw1.ts[1] = params->offload.desc_ts[1];
> + desc->flow.qw1.ts[2] = params->offload.desc_ts[2];
>
> The fix is queued. If there is consensus, I can respin. But given that
> we will clean this up in net-next properly, my preference is to keep
> the minimal fix as is.
I'm fine with this. Was the cleanup patch already posted to next?
Thanks,
Marcin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc
2026-08-06 14:32 ` Marcin Szycik
@ 2026-08-06 15:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Willem de Bruijn @ 2026-08-06 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcin Szycik, Willem de Bruijn, netdev
Cc: intel-wired-lan, anthony.l.nguyen, joshua.a.hay,
przemyslaw.kitszel, Willem de Bruijn
Marcin Szycik wrote:
>
>
> On 06/08/2026 16:19, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > Marcin Szycik wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 03/08/2026 23:06, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> >>>
> >>> idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc performs a 32-bit store to &cmd_dtype
> >>> to set the 8-bit cmd_dtype and zero the adjacent 3-byte timestamp
> >>> field in a single operation.
> >>>
> >>> Descriptors are in little endian. Add missing cpu_to_le32 and cast to
> >>> __le32 to ensure the fields are written correctly also on big endian
> >>> platforms.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 1a49cf814fe1 ("idpf: add Tx timestamp flows")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes
> >>> v1 -> v2
> >>> - add Fixes tag, Tony's Reviewed-by and Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> >>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260731103137.4000876-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com/
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> >>> index c724d429a7aa..91ca75e45463 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> >>> @@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
> >>> struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
> >>> u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
> >>> {
> >>> - *(u32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
> >>> + *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
> >>
> >> While it technically works, I find it unreadable. Looking at this line
> >> without reading commit msg, it looks like a bug where a 4-byte value is
> >> written to u8 field. The intent to zero an adjacent, unrelated field is
> >> not clear. Consider assigning these 4 fields manually, or adding a
> >> comment/function doc.
> >
> > This is a bug fix, which generally should be the smallest surgical
> > change only.
>
> Agreed.
> > That said, I do agree on the style, and a follow-up for net-next will
> > clean that up too:
> >
> > @@ -2408,7 +2410,12 @@ void idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc(union idpf_tx_flex_desc *desc,
> > struct idpf_tx_splitq_params *params,
> > u16 td_cmd, u16 size)
> > {
> > - *(__le32 *)&desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = cpu_to_le32((u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd));
> > + desc->flow.qw1.cmd_dtype = (u8)(params->dtype | td_cmd);
> > +
> > + desc->flow.qw1.ts[0] = params->offload.desc_ts[0];
> > + desc->flow.qw1.ts[1] = params->offload.desc_ts[1];
> > + desc->flow.qw1.ts[2] = params->offload.desc_ts[2];
> >
> > The fix is queued. If there is consensus, I can respin. But given that
> > we will clean this up in net-next properly, my preference is to keep
> > the minimal fix as is.
>
> I'm fine with this.
Great.
> Was the cleanup patch already posted to next?
Not yet. I'll try to send the series later today.
It will have a (trivial) conflict with this line. But I will likely
need to respin again, so don't want t wait for that (and the merge
window).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-06 15:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-03 21:06 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2] idpf: add missing cpu_to_le32 in idpf_tx_splitq_build_flow_desc Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-04 12:13 ` Jason Xing
2026-08-05 14:39 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-08-06 12:26 ` Marcin Szycik
2026-08-06 14:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-06 14:32 ` Marcin Szycik
2026-08-06 15:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox