Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net 0/4] Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in intel ether drivers

[Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>]

On 10/25/24 05:30, Yue Haibing wrote:
> On 2024/10/23 3:17, Jacob Keller wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/22/2024 12:32 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:56:19PM +0800, Yue Haibing wrote:
>>>> Fixing sparse error in xdp run code by introducing new variable xdp_res
>>>> instead of overloading this into the skb pointer as i40e drivers done
>>>> in commit 12738ac4754e ("i40e: Fix sparse errors in i40e_txrx.c") and
>>>> commit ae4393dfd472 ("i40e: fix broken XDP support").
>>>>
>>>> v3: Fix uninitialized 'xdp_res' in patch 3 and 4 which Reported-by
>>>>      kernel test robot
>>>> v2: Fix this as i40e drivers done instead of return NULL in xdp run code
>>>
>>> Hi Yue Haibing, all,
>>>
>>> I like these changes a lot. But I do wonder if it would
>>> be more appropriate to target them at net-next (or iwl-next)
>>> rather than net, without Fixes tags. This is because they
>>> don't seem to be fixing (user-visible) bugs. Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> ...
>>
>> Yea, these do seem like next candidates.
> 
> Should I resend this serial target to iwl-next?
yes, please
(please also link to v3 from v4)