* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() [not found] <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> @ 2016-01-01 14:32 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-01-01 14:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" " SF Markus Elfring ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-01-01 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:11:09 +0100 Replace explicit initialisations for four local variables at the beginning by assignments that will only be performed if the corresponding code will really be executed. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c index aa58a49..e0874f5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c @@ -1172,16 +1172,18 @@ static int i40e_vc_get_version_msg(struct i40e_vf *vf, u8 *msg) **/ static int i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg(struct i40e_vf *vf, u8 *msg) { - struct i40e_virtchnl_vf_resource *vfres = NULL; - struct i40e_pf *pf = vf->pf; - i40e_status aq_ret = 0; + struct i40e_virtchnl_vf_resource *vfres; + struct i40e_pf *pf; + i40e_status aq_ret; struct i40e_vsi *vsi; - int i = 0, len = 0; + int i = 0; int num_vsis = 1; - int ret; + int len, ret; if (!test_bit(I40E_VF_STAT_INIT, &vf->vf_states)) { aq_ret = I40E_ERR_PARAM; + vfres = NULL; + len = 0; goto err; } @@ -1202,6 +1204,7 @@ static int i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg(struct i40e_vf *vf, u8 *msg) I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN; vfres->vf_offload_flags = I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_L2; + pf = vf->pf; vsi = pf->vsi[vf->lan_vsi_idx]; if (!vsi->info.pvid) vfres->vf_offload_flags |= I40E_VIRTCHNL_VF_OFFLOAD_VLAN; @@ -1231,7 +1234,7 @@ static int i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg(struct i40e_vf *vf, u8 *msg) i++; } set_bit(I40E_VF_STAT_ACTIVE, &vf->vf_states); - + aq_ret = 0; err: /* send the response back to the VF */ ret = i40e_vc_send_msg_to_vf(vf, I40E_VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_VF_RESOURCES, -- 2.6.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() 2016-01-01 14:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-01-01 14:51 ` SF Markus Elfring 2016-01-08 20:51 ` Nelson, Shannon 2016-01-07 22:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments " Nelson, Shannon 2016-01-08 10:42 ` Jeff Kirsher 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-01-01 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan Hello, I have taken another look at the implementation of the function "i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg". I find the use of the variable "i" strange there. It seems that the value from the increment operation in an if branch is not reused so far. I would appreciate a further clarification. Can this variable be eventually deleted? Regards, Markus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() 2016-01-01 14:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" " SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-01-08 20:51 ` Nelson, Shannon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nelson, Shannon @ 2016-01-08 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan > From: SF Markus Elfring [mailto:elfring at users.sourceforge.net] > > Hello, > > I have taken another look at the implementation of the > function "i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg". I find the use of the variable > "i" > strange there. It seems that the value from the increment operation in > an > if branch is not reused so far. > > I would appreciate a further clarification. > Can this variable be eventually deleted? Thanks for pointing this out. We've got an internal patch coming that will address this. Cheers, sln ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() 2016-01-01 14:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() SF Markus Elfring 2016-01-01 14:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" " SF Markus Elfring @ 2016-01-07 22:43 ` Nelson, Shannon 2016-01-08 10:42 ` Jeff Kirsher 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Nelson, Shannon @ 2016-01-07 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan > From: SF Markus Elfring [mailto:elfring at users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 6:33 AM > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:11:09 +0100 > > Replace explicit initialisations for four local variables at the beginning > by assignments that will only be performed if the corresponding code > will really be executed. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > --- This seems to me to be unnecessary fussing with the code. sln ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() 2016-01-01 14:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() SF Markus Elfring 2016-01-01 14:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" " SF Markus Elfring 2016-01-07 22:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments " Nelson, Shannon @ 2016-01-08 10:42 ` Jeff Kirsher 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Jeff Kirsher @ 2016-01-08 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: intel-wired-lan On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 15:32 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:11:09 +0100 > > Replace explicit initialisations for four local variables at the > beginning > by assignments that will only be performed if the corresponding code > will really be executed. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > --- > ?drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c | 15 +++++++++--- > --- > ?1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Dropping this patch based on feedback from Shannon. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160108/d5613803/attachment.asc> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-08 20:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
2016-01-01 14:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments in i40e_vc_get_vf_resources_msg() SF Markus Elfring
2016-01-01 14:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] net-i40e: Reconsider further usage of variable "i" " SF Markus Elfring
2016-01-08 20:51 ` Nelson, Shannon
2016-01-07 22:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net-i40e: Replace variable initialisations by assignments " Nelson, Shannon
2016-01-08 10:42 ` Jeff Kirsher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox