From: Samudrala, Sridhar <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v3] i40e/i40evf: Update driver to support napi_complete_done changes
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:22:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <584B3CB2.9070806@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161208001248.13098.93773.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On 12/7/2016 4:14 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>
> Recently napi_complete_done was updated so that it will return zero if we
> are using the queue vector for busy polling. When this is the case we
> don't need to re-enable interrupts as the busy polling will reschedule the
> NAPI instance when it is finally done polling.
This patch is causing a regression with memcached when using epoll with
busy polling.
I think we need to do more investigation before pushing or re-working
this patch.
Thanks
Sridhar
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Updated code to place the IRQ enabling inside the if statment
> This made it so that we are consistent with the recent return value changes
>
> v3: Added i40evf changes as well
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 32 +++++++++++++------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> index e88e335c34ef..f9ef8c2676e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
> @@ -2033,22 +2033,24 @@ int i40e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> }
> }
>
> - if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> - q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> -
> - /* Work is done so exit the polling mode and re-enable the interrupt */
> - napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
> -
> - /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> - * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> - * issue a call to i40e_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + /* Work is done so exit the polling mode,
> + * if not busy polling re-enable interrupts.
> */
> - if (!clean_complete)
> - i40e_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> - else if (!(vsi->back->flags & I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENABLED))
> - i40e_irq_dynamic_enable_icr0(vsi->back, false);
> - else
> - i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> + if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> + q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> +
> + /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> + * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> + * issue a call to i40e_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + */
> + if (!clean_complete)
> + i40e_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> + else if (!(vsi->back->flags & I40E_FLAG_MSIX_ENABLED))
> + i40e_irq_dynamic_enable_icr0(vsi->back, false);
> + else
> + i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + }
>
> return min(work_done, budget - 1);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
> index 4870cb50dc33..3097a91bd4aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
> @@ -1494,20 +1494,22 @@ int i40evf_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> }
> }
>
> - if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> - q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> -
> - /* Work is done so exit the polling mode and re-enable the interrupt */
> - napi_complete_done(napi, work_done);
> -
> - /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> - * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> - * issue a call to i40evf_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + /* Work is done so exit the polling mode,
> + * if not busy polling re-enable interrupts.
> */
> - if (!clean_complete)
> - i40evf_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> - else
> - i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + if (napi_complete_done(napi, work_done)) {
> + if (vsi->back->flags & I40E_TXR_FLAGS_WB_ON_ITR)
> + q_vector->arm_wb_state = false;
> +
> + /* If we're prematurely stopping polling to fix the interrupt
> + * affinity we want to make sure polling starts back up so we
> + * issue a call to i40evf_force_wb which triggers a SW interrupt.
> + */
> + if (!clean_complete)
> + i40evf_force_wb(vsi, q_vector);
> + else
> + i40e_update_enable_itr(vsi, q_vector);
> + }
>
> return min(work_done, budget - 1);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-09 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-08 0:14 [Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH v3] i40e/i40evf: Update driver to support napi_complete_done changes Alexander Duyck
2016-12-09 23:22 ` Samudrala, Sridhar [this message]
2017-01-05 22:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-01-05 22:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-01-05 22:26 ` Jeff Kirsher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=584B3CB2.9070806@intel.com \
--to=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox