From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:20:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5893B095.6030104@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UdZiMPPab-2v_0yvVqc7uA+uYNGAfu36WXvfETxah_B_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 17-02-01 01:32 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2017-01-31 22:37 GMT+01:00 Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>:
>>> We probably need to respin this and do a v5 of the XDP code so that we
>>> can reserve some headroom at the start of the frames. I have patches
>>> I already working on to enable build_skb like I have done for igb and
>>> ixgbe. I can probably take on respinning this and getting it applied
>>> to our out-of-tree driver.
>>
>> Respinning or an additional patch for the xdp_adjust_head()
>> support? Maybe it's better to respin it, so we get proper
>> xdp_adjust_head() support, prior upstreaming.
>
> It makes the upstreaming process easier for us since we normally work
> out of tree and then upstream patches after testing in the case of
> i40e.
>
Any hints on when we can expect a v5 to show up? I have a few folks
pulling these outside Intel that are waiting to get these patches.
>> If headroom support for XDP aligns nicely into your build_skb
>> patches for i40e, feel free to do that! If not, let me know, and
>> I'll start working on it.
>
> Yeah, I'll be working on providing headroom in order to support
> build_skb anyway so I can just combine the efforts. Then it makes the
> upstreaming effort easier as well as we will have the headroom added
> before we actually start work on XDP.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Alex
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-02 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-17 13:39 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 1/4] i40e: Sync DMA region prior skbuff allocation =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:35 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 2/4] i40e: Initial support for XDP =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:35 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 3/4] i40e: Add XDP_TX support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:36 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 4/4] i40e: Validate xdp_adjust_head support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:36 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2017-01-31 21:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP Alexander Duyck
2017-01-31 22:30 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-02-01 21:32 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-02 11:34 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-02-02 22:20 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-02-02 22:57 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-06 22:02 ` John Fastabend
2017-02-06 23:09 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5893B095.6030104@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox