Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:02:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5898F271.1000009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UeLL4xyWVZH3Fvrsg7SpHZ-X-PGYz-NOP7NzgiagOGzow@mail.gmail.com>

On 17-02-02 02:57 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> It would likely be several weeks.  I am still trying to finish up the
> out-of-tree build_skb changes for i40e.  Once I have that then I can
> start working on the XDP bits.
> 
> My guess would be that these would probably end up in the 4.12 kernel
> when everything is said and done.

OK, iirc though ixgbe already has these changes and we can add XDP support
without any delays there?

I have a handful of folks wanting to test/use this with adjust_header support
so for the time being I'm going to push a fork to my github branch for folks
to pull. But the sooner the better for mainline support.

Thanks,
John

> 
> - Alex
> 
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:20 PM, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17-02-01 01:32 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Bj?rn T?pel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2017-01-31 22:37 GMT+01:00 Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>:
>>>>> We probably need to respin this and do a v5 of the XDP code so that we
>>>>> can reserve some headroom at the start of the frames.  I have patches
>>>>> I already working on to enable build_skb like I have done for igb and
>>>>> ixgbe.  I can probably take on respinning this and getting it applied
>>>>> to our out-of-tree driver.
>>>>
>>>> Respinning or an additional patch for the xdp_adjust_head()
>>>> support? Maybe it's better to respin it, so we get proper
>>>> xdp_adjust_head() support, prior upstreaming.
>>>
>>> It makes the upstreaming process easier for us since we normally work
>>> out of tree and then upstream patches after testing in the case of
>>> i40e.
>>>
>>
>> Any hints on when we can expect a v5 to show up? I have a few folks
>> pulling these outside Intel that are waiting to get these patches.
>>
>>>> If headroom support for XDP aligns nicely into your build_skb
>>>> patches for i40e, feel free to do that! If not, let me know, and
>>>> I'll start working on it.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'll be working on providing headroom in order to support
>>> build_skb anyway so I can just combine the efforts.  Then it makes the
>>> upstreaming effort easier as well as we will have the headroom added
>>> before we actually start work on XDP.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> - Alex
>>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-06 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-17 13:39 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 1/4] i40e: Sync DMA region prior skbuff allocation =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:35   ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 2/4] i40e: Initial support for XDP =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:35   ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 3/4] i40e: Add XDP_TX support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:36   ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-12-17 13:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 4/4] i40e: Validate xdp_adjust_head support =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2016-12-23 17:36   ` Bowers, AndrewX
2017-01-31 21:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v4 0/4] i40e: Support for XDP Alexander Duyck
2017-01-31 22:30   ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-02-01 21:32     ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-02 11:34       ` =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-02-02 22:20       ` John Fastabend
2017-02-02 22:57         ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-06 22:02           ` John Fastabend [this message]
2017-02-06 23:09             ` Alexander Duyck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5898F271.1000009@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox