[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: Add support for Alder Lake

[Neftin, Sasha <sasha.neftin@intel.com>]

On 1/19/2020 13:02, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Sasha,
> 
> 
> Am 19.01.20 um 08:46 schrieb Sasha Neftin:
>> Add devices ID's for the next LOM generations that will be
>> available on the next Intel Client platform (Alder Lake)
>> This patch provides the initial support for these devices
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> Address comminuty comments
> 
> community
thanks, will fix the typo in v3
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
>> ---
>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c | 3 ++-
>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h????? | 5 +++++
>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 7 +++++++
>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c? | 7 ++++++-
>> ? drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ptp.c???? | 1 +
>> ? 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
>> index adce7e319b9e..aac0b7fb6243 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
>> @@ -895,8 +895,8 @@ static int e1000_reg_test(struct e1000_adapter 
>> *adapter, u64 *data)
>> ????? case e1000_pch_lpt:
>> ????? case e1000_pch_spt:
>> ????? case e1000_pch_cnp:
>> -??????? /* fall through */
> 
> Please split this out, or mention this in a commit message. Also, there 
> are more instances. If you want, I can sent a clean-up commit for the 
> unnecessary fall-through comments.
> 
> [?]
This is unrelated statement to this patch. I think we should process 
separate patch to clean up unneeded "fall through" statements. You can 
do it if you want, otherwise we will do it later.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul