From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: <poros@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ice: Unregister netdev and devlink_port only once
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:03:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <711c5c6d-4b7d-d139-e52f-5d15964402a9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eda7b84e56123bce167a64133572440e6806ef1e.camel@redhat.com>
On 7/6/2023 2:30 PM, Petr Oros wrote:
> Petr Oros píše v Po 19. 06. 2023 v 12:58 +0200:
>> Since commit 6624e780a577fc ("ice: split ice_vsi_setup into smaller
>> functions") ice_vsi_release does things twice. There is unregister
>> netdev which is unregistered in ice_deinit_eth also.
>>
>> It also unregisters the devlink_port twice which is also unregistered
>> in ice_deinit_eth(). This double deregistration is hidden because
>> devl_port_unregister ignores the return value of xa_erase.
>>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to push this patch forward? I think the questions have
> been answered. Or is something still unclear?
I was expecting a new version based on the question/request [1] (so set
to changes requested) before the response. Will apply and have it move
forward.
Thanks,
Tony
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/eda7b84e56123bce167a64133572440e6806ef1e.camel@redhat.com/T/#mbef0a70424d01bb8fcc1ae1a4865c617fbb4befc
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-07 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 10:58 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2] ice: Unregister netdev and devlink_port only once Petr Oros
2023-06-19 15:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-06-20 7:55 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-06-20 7:50 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-07-06 21:30 ` Petr Oros
2023-07-07 17:03 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2023-07-14 8:59 ` Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=711c5c6d-4b7d-d139-e52f-5d15964402a9@intel.com \
--to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=poros@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox