From: Nambiar, Amritha <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/6] [net-next]net: sched: act_mirred: Extend redirect action to accept a traffic class
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:20:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ee73404-a304-646d-d4d5-62386f373ad2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170801111203.GI1939@nanopsycho>
On 8/1/2017 4:12 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:37:37AM CEST, amritha.nambiar at intel.com wrote:
>> The Mirred/redirect action is extended to forward to a traffic
>> class on the device. The traffic class index needs to be
>> provided in addition to the device's ifindex.
>>
>> Example:
>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 flower\
>> dst_ip 192.168.1.1/32 ip_proto udp dst_port 22\
>> skip_sw indev eth0 action mirred ingress redirect dev eth0 tc 1
>
> You need to make sure that the current offloaders fill forbid to add
> this rule, not just silently ignore the tc value.
I will fix this in the next version, probably using the 'flags' field
I've defined.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h | 7 +++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h | 5 +++++
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h
>> index 604bc31..60058c4 100644
>> --- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_mirred.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ struct tcf_mirred {
>> int tcfm_eaction;
>> int tcfm_ifindex;
>> bool tcfm_mac_header_xmit;
>> + u8 tcfm_tc;
>> + u32 flags;
>> struct net_device __rcu *tcfm_dev;
>> struct list_head tcfm_list;
>> };
>> @@ -37,4 +39,9 @@ static inline int tcf_mirred_ifindex(const struct tc_action *a)
>> return to_mirred(a)->tcfm_ifindex;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int tcf_mirred_tc(const struct tc_action *a)
>> +{
>> + return to_mirred(a)->tcfm_tc;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* __NET_TC_MIR_H */
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h
>> index 3d7a2b3..8ff4d76 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tc_act/tc_mirred.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
>> #define TCA_EGRESS_MIRROR 2 /* mirror packet to EGRESS */
>> #define TCA_INGRESS_REDIR 3 /* packet redirect to INGRESS*/
>> #define TCA_INGRESS_MIRROR 4 /* mirror packet to INGRESS */
>> +
>> +#define MIRRED_F_TC_MAP 0x1
>> +#define MIRRED_TC_MAP_MAX 0x10
>> +#define MIRRED_TC_MAP_MASK 0xF
>
> I'm completely lost. Why do you have these values here? and in fact one
> twice?
I'll fix this to remove the defines for the TC max range and its bitmap
here and reuse the existing ones defined in linux/netdevice.h
>
>
>>
>> struct tc_mirred {
>> tc_gen;
>> @@ -21,6 +25,7 @@ enum {
>> TCA_MIRRED_TM,
>> TCA_MIRRED_PARMS,
>> TCA_MIRRED_PAD,
>> + TCA_MIRRED_TC_MAP,
>> __TCA_MIRRED_MAX
>> };
>> #define TCA_MIRRED_MAX (__TCA_MIRRED_MAX - 1)
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
>> index 1b5549a..f9801de 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
>> @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void tcf_mirred_release(struct tc_action *a, int bind)
>>
>> static const struct nla_policy mirred_policy[TCA_MIRRED_MAX + 1] = {
>> [TCA_MIRRED_PARMS] = { .len = sizeof(struct tc_mirred) },
>> + [TCA_MIRRED_TC_MAP] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
>> };
>>
>> static unsigned int mirred_net_id;
>> @@ -83,6 +84,8 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> struct tcf_mirred *m;
>> struct net_device *dev;
>> bool exists = false;
>> + u8 *tc_map = NULL;
>> + u32 flags = 0;
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (nla == NULL)
>> @@ -92,6 +95,14 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> return ret;
>> if (tb[TCA_MIRRED_PARMS] == NULL)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (tb[TCA_MIRRED_TC_MAP]) {
>> + tc_map = nla_data(tb[TCA_MIRRED_TC_MAP]);
>> + if (*tc_map >= MIRRED_TC_MAP_MAX)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + flags |= MIRRED_F_TC_MAP;
>> + }
>> +
>> parm = nla_data(tb[TCA_MIRRED_PARMS]);
>>
>> exists = tcf_hash_check(tn, parm->index, a, bind);
>> @@ -139,6 +150,7 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> ASSERT_RTNL();
>> m->tcf_action = parm->action;
>> m->tcfm_eaction = parm->eaction;
>> + m->flags = flags;
>> if (dev != NULL) {
>> m->tcfm_ifindex = parm->ifindex;
>> if (ret != ACT_P_CREATED)
>> @@ -146,6 +158,8 @@ static int tcf_mirred_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> dev_hold(dev);
>> rcu_assign_pointer(m->tcfm_dev, dev);
>> m->tcfm_mac_header_xmit = mac_header_xmit;
>> + if (flags & MIRRED_F_TC_MAP)
>> + m->tcfm_tc = *tc_map & MIRRED_TC_MAP_MASK;
>> }
>>
>> if (ret == ACT_P_CREATED) {
>> @@ -259,6 +273,9 @@ static int tcf_mirred_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int bind,
>>
>> if (nla_put(skb, TCA_MIRRED_PARMS, sizeof(opt), &opt))
>> goto nla_put_failure;
>> + if ((m->flags & MIRRED_F_TC_MAP) &&
>> + nla_put_u8(skb, TCA_MIRRED_TC_MAP, m->tcfm_tc))
>> + goto nla_put_failure;
>>
>> tcf_tm_dump(&t, &m->tcf_tm);
>> if (nla_put_64bit(skb, TCA_MIRRED_TM, sizeof(t), &t, TCA_MIRRED_PAD))
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-02 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-01 0:36 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next RFC 0/6] Configure cloud filters in i40e via tc/flower classifier Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/6] [net-next]net: sched: act_mirred: Extend redirect action to accept a traffic class Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 10:22 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-02 1:12 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 10:44 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-02 1:42 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 11:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-08-02 2:20 ` Nambiar, Amritha [this message]
2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Maintain a mapping of TCs with the VSI seids Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 3/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Extend set switch config command to accept cloud filter mode Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 10:48 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 4/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Admin queue definitions for cloud filters Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson
2017-08-14 18:59 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 0:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 5/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Clean up of " Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson
2017-08-14 19:06 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 0:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 6/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Enable cloud filters in i40e via tc/flower classifier Amritha Nambiar
2017-08-01 10:56 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-02 2:13 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-02 12:02 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-02 18:20 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson
2017-08-14 19:21 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 10:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next RFC 0/6] Configure " Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-02 0:57 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-02 12:01 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2017-08-02 18:17 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ee73404-a304-646d-d4d5-62386f373ad2@intel.com \
--to=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox