* [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
@ 2024-06-10 1:32 Hui Wang
2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hui Wang @ 2024-06-10 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan, netdev, kuba, anthony.l.nguyen, vitaly.lifshits,
dima.ruinskiy, davem, pabeni, edumazet, sasha.neftin, naamax.meir
Cc: pmenzel, hui.wang, horms, jacob.e.keller, todd.e.brandt,
rui.zhang, dmummenschanz
This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28
Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of
enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some
ethernet cards, at the moment, the pciid of the affected ethernet
cards include [8086:15b8] and [8086:15bc].
About the regression the commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force
SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") tried to fix, looks like
it is not trivial to fix, we need to find a better way to resolve it.
Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@intel.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218940
Reported-by: Dieter Mummenschanz <dmummenschanz@web.de>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218936
Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 22 ---------------------
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
index 2e98a2a0bead..f9e94be36e97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
@@ -1225,28 +1225,6 @@ s32 e1000_enable_ulp_lpt_lp(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool to_sx)
}
release:
- /* Switching PHY interface always returns MDI error
- * so disable retry mechanism to avoid wasting time
- */
- e1000e_disable_phy_retry(hw);
-
- /* Force SMBus mode in PHY */
- ret_val = e1000_read_phy_reg_hv_locked(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, &phy_reg);
- if (ret_val) {
- e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
- hw->phy.ops.release(hw);
- goto out;
- }
- phy_reg |= CV_SMB_CTRL_FORCE_SMBUS;
- e1000_write_phy_reg_hv_locked(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, phy_reg);
-
- e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
-
- /* Force SMBus mode in MAC */
- mac_reg = er32(CTRL_EXT);
- mac_reg |= E1000_CTRL_EXT_FORCE_SMBUS;
- ew32(CTRL_EXT, mac_reg);
-
hw->phy.ops.release(hw);
out:
if (ret_val)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index da5c59daf8ba..220d62fca55d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -6623,6 +6623,7 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool runtime)
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
u32 ctrl, ctrl_ext, rctl, status, wufc;
int retval = 0;
+ u16 smb_ctrl;
/* Runtime suspend should only enable wakeup for link changes */
if (runtime)
@@ -6696,6 +6697,23 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool runtime)
if (retval)
return retval;
}
+
+ /* Force SMBUS to allow WOL */
+ /* Switching PHY interface always returns MDI error
+ * so disable retry mechanism to avoid wasting time
+ */
+ e1000e_disable_phy_retry(hw);
+
+ e1e_rphy(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, &smb_ctrl);
+ smb_ctrl |= CV_SMB_CTRL_FORCE_SMBUS;
+ e1e_wphy(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, smb_ctrl);
+
+ e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
+
+ /* Force SMBus mode in MAC */
+ ctrl_ext = er32(CTRL_EXT);
+ ctrl_ext |= E1000_CTRL_EXT_FORCE_SMBUS;
+ ew32(CTRL_EXT, ctrl_ext);
}
/* Ensure that the appropriate bits are set in LPI_CTRL
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
2024-06-10 1:32 [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function" Hui Wang
@ 2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-11 5:43 ` Hui Wang
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2024-06-10 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hui Wang, intel-wired-lan, netdev, kuba, anthony.l.nguyen,
vitaly.lifshits, dima.ruinskiy, davem, pabeni, edumazet,
sasha.neftin, naamax.meir
Cc: regressions, horms, jacob.e.keller, todd.e.brandt, rui.zhang,
Naama Meir, dmummenschanz
Dear Hui,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang:
> This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28
>
> Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of
> enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some
> ethernet cards, at the moment, the pciid of the affected ethernet
> cards include [8086:15b8] and [8086:15bc].
>
> About the regression the commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force
… regression introduced by commit …
> SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") tried to fix, looks like
> it is not trivial to fix, we need to find a better way to resolve it.
Please send a revert for commit 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force SMBUS
from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue), present since Linux
v6.9-rc3 and not containing enough information in the commit messsage,
so we have a proper baseline. (That’s also why I originally suggested to
split it into two commits (revert + your change).)
> Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@intel.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218940
> Reported-by: Dieter Mummenschanz <dmummenschanz@web.de>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218936
> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 22 ---------------------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> index 2e98a2a0bead..f9e94be36e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> @@ -1225,28 +1225,6 @@ s32 e1000_enable_ulp_lpt_lp(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool to_sx)
> }
>
> release:
> - /* Switching PHY interface always returns MDI error
> - * so disable retry mechanism to avoid wasting time
> - */
> - e1000e_disable_phy_retry(hw);
> -
> - /* Force SMBus mode in PHY */
> - ret_val = e1000_read_phy_reg_hv_locked(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, &phy_reg);
> - if (ret_val) {
> - e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
> - hw->phy.ops.release(hw);
> - goto out;
> - }
> - phy_reg |= CV_SMB_CTRL_FORCE_SMBUS;
> - e1000_write_phy_reg_hv_locked(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, phy_reg);
> -
> - e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
> -
> - /* Force SMBus mode in MAC */
> - mac_reg = er32(CTRL_EXT);
> - mac_reg |= E1000_CTRL_EXT_FORCE_SMBUS;
> - ew32(CTRL_EXT, mac_reg);
> -
> hw->phy.ops.release(hw);
> out:
> if (ret_val)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index da5c59daf8ba..220d62fca55d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -6623,6 +6623,7 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool runtime)
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> u32 ctrl, ctrl_ext, rctl, status, wufc;
> int retval = 0;
> + u16 smb_ctrl;
>
> /* Runtime suspend should only enable wakeup for link changes */
> if (runtime)
> @@ -6696,6 +6697,23 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool runtime)
> if (retval)
> return retval;
> }
> +
> + /* Force SMBUS to allow WOL */
> + /* Switching PHY interface always returns MDI error
> + * so disable retry mechanism to avoid wasting time
> + */
> + e1000e_disable_phy_retry(hw);
> +
> + e1e_rphy(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, &smb_ctrl);
> + smb_ctrl |= CV_SMB_CTRL_FORCE_SMBUS;
> + e1e_wphy(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, smb_ctrl);
> +
> + e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
> +
> + /* Force SMBus mode in MAC */
> + ctrl_ext = er32(CTRL_EXT);
> + ctrl_ext |= E1000_CTRL_EXT_FORCE_SMBUS;
> + ew32(CTRL_EXT, ctrl_ext);
> }
>
> /* Ensure that the appropriate bits are set in LPI_CTRL
Naama also added Tested-by lines two both commits in question. Could
Intel’s test coverage please extended to the problem at hand?
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Kind regards,
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
@ 2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-11 5:45 ` Hui Wang
2024-06-11 5:43 ` Hui Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Rui @ 2024-06-10 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, hui.wang@canonical.com,
davem@davemloft.net, naamax.meir@linux.intel.com, Ruinskiy, Dima,
Lifshits, Vitaly, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Nguyen, Anthony L,
Neftin, Sasha, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: Keller, Jacob E, Brandt, Todd E, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
horms@kernel.org, dmummenschanz@web.de
On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Hui,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
>
> Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang:
> > This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28
> >
> > Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of
> > enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some
> > ethernet cards, at the moment, the pciid of the affected ethernet
> > cards include [8086:15b8] and [8086:15bc].
> >
> > About the regression the commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force
>
> … regression introduced by commit …
>
> > SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") tried to fix, looks
> > like
> > it is not trivial to fix, we need to find a better way to resolve
> > it.
>
> Please send a revert for commit 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force
> SMBUS
> from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue), present since
> Linux
> v6.9-rc3 and not containing enough information in the commit
> messsage,
> so we have a proper baseline. (That’s also why I originally suggested
> to
> split it into two commits (revert + your change).)
>
> > Reported-by: Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218940
> > Reported-by: Dieter Mummenschanz <dmummenschanz@web.de>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218936
> > Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 22 ----------------
> > -----
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 18
> > +++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> > index 2e98a2a0bead..f9e94be36e97 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> > @@ -1225,28 +1225,6 @@ s32 e1000_enable_ulp_lpt_lp(struct e1000_hw
> > *hw, bool to_sx)
> > }
> >
> > release:
> > - /* Switching PHY interface always returns MDI error
> > - * so disable retry mechanism to avoid wasting time
> > - */
> > - e1000e_disable_phy_retry(hw);
> > -
> > - /* Force SMBus mode in PHY */
> > - ret_val = e1000_read_phy_reg_hv_locked(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL,
> > &phy_reg);
> > - if (ret_val) {
> > - e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
> > - hw->phy.ops.release(hw);
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > - phy_reg |= CV_SMB_CTRL_FORCE_SMBUS;
> > - e1000_write_phy_reg_hv_locked(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, phy_reg);
> > -
> > - e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
> > -
> > - /* Force SMBus mode in MAC */
> > - mac_reg = er32(CTRL_EXT);
> > - mac_reg |= E1000_CTRL_EXT_FORCE_SMBUS;
> > - ew32(CTRL_EXT, mac_reg);
> > -
> > hw->phy.ops.release(hw);
> > out:
> > if (ret_val)
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > index da5c59daf8ba..220d62fca55d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> > @@ -6623,6 +6623,7 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev, bool runtime)
> > struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> > u32 ctrl, ctrl_ext, rctl, status, wufc;
> > int retval = 0;
> > + u16 smb_ctrl;
> >
> > /* Runtime suspend should only enable wakeup for link
> > changes */
> > if (runtime)
> > @@ -6696,6 +6697,23 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev, bool runtime)
> > if (retval)
> > return retval;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* Force SMBUS to allow WOL */
> > + /* Switching PHY interface always returns MDI error
> > + * so disable retry mechanism to avoid wasting time
> > + */
> > + e1000e_disable_phy_retry(hw);
> > +
> > + e1e_rphy(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, &smb_ctrl);
> > + smb_ctrl |= CV_SMB_CTRL_FORCE_SMBUS;
> > + e1e_wphy(hw, CV_SMB_CTRL, smb_ctrl);
> > +
> > + e1000e_enable_phy_retry(hw);
> > +
> > + /* Force SMBus mode in MAC */
> > + ctrl_ext = er32(CTRL_EXT);
> > + ctrl_ext |= E1000_CTRL_EXT_FORCE_SMBUS;
> > + ew32(CTRL_EXT, ctrl_ext);
> > }
> >
> > /* Ensure that the appropriate bits are set in LPI_CTRL
>
> Naama also added Tested-by lines two both commits in question. Could
> Intel’s test coverage please extended to the problem at hand?
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Plus that,
1. Todd and I can test with upstream + this patch to confirm that
a. the regression for Todd is gone.
b. the s2idle failure for me is back
2. I can test with upstream + this patch + revert of commit
861e8086029e (e1000e: move force SMBUS from enable ulp function to
avoid PHY loss issue) to confirm s2idle is working again.
thanks,
rui
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
@ 2024-06-11 5:43 ` Hui Wang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hui Wang @ 2024-06-11 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Menzel, intel-wired-lan, netdev, kuba, anthony.l.nguyen,
vitaly.lifshits, dima.ruinskiy, davem, pabeni, edumazet,
sasha.neftin, naamax.meir
Cc: regressions, horms, jacob.e.keller, todd.e.brandt, rui.zhang,
dmummenschanz
On 6/10/24 14:36, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Hui,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
>
> Am 10.06.24 um 03:32 schrieb Hui Wang:
>> This reverts commit bfd546a552e140b0a4c8a21527c39d6d21addb28
>>
>> Commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of
>> enable_ulp function") introduces system suspend failure on some
>> ethernet cards, at the moment, the pciid of the affected ethernet
>> cards include [8086:15b8] and [8086:15bc].
>>
>> About the regression the commit bfd546a552e1 ("e1000e: move force
>
> … regression introduced by commit …
Got it.
>
>> SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function") tried to fix, looks like
>> it is not trivial to fix, we need to find a better way to resolve it.
>
> Please send a revert for commit 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force SMBUS
> from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue), present since Linux
> v6.9-rc3 and not containing enough information in the commit messsage,
> so we have a proper baseline. (That’s also why I originally suggested
> to split it into two commits (revert + your change).)
In regards to reverting the commit 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force
SMBUS from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue), the author is
Vitaly, let him evaluate how to act.
Thanks.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function"
2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
@ 2024-06-11 5:45 ` Hui Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hui Wang @ 2024-06-11 5:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Rui, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, davem@davemloft.net,
naamax.meir@linux.intel.com, Ruinskiy, Dima, Lifshits, Vitaly,
kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, Nguyen, Anthony L,
Neftin, Sasha, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: Keller, Jacob E, Brandt, Todd E, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
horms@kernel.org, dmummenschanz@web.de
On 6/10/24 22:14, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 08:36 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Dear Hui,
>>
>>
>>
>> Naama also added Tested-by lines two both commits in question. Could
>> Intel’s test coverage please extended to the problem at hand?
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> Plus that,
> 1. Todd and I can test with upstream + this patch to confirm that
> a. the regression for Todd is gone.
> b. the s2idle failure for me is back
> 2. I can test with upstream + this patch + revert of commit
> 861e8086029e (e1000e: move force SMBUS from enable ulp function to
> avoid PHY loss issue) to confirm s2idle is working again.
>
> thanks,
> rui
Thanks.
>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-11 5:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-10 1:32 [Intel-wired-lan] [iwl-net][PATCH] Revert "e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function" Hui Wang
2024-06-10 6:36 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-10 14:14 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-11 5:45 ` Hui Wang
2024-06-11 5:43 ` Hui Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox