From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 4/5] net/mlx5: Register separate reload devlink ops for multiport device
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 17:16:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVR1PKQjsBfvUTPU@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929065549.43b13203@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 06:55:49AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:00:45 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Mulitport slave device doesn't support devlink reload, so instead of
> > complicating initialization flow with devlink_reload_enable() which
> > will be removed in next patch, set specialized devlink ops callbacks
> > for reload operations.
> >
> > This fixes an error when reload counters exposed (and equal zero) for
> > the mode that is not supported at all.
> >
> > Fixes: d89ddaae1766 ("net/mlx5: Disable devlink reload for multi port slave device")
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
> > index 47c9f7f5bb79..e85eca6976a9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c
> > @@ -309,14 +309,17 @@ static struct devlink_ops mlx5_devlink_ops = {
> > #endif
> > .flash_update = mlx5_devlink_flash_update,
> > .info_get = mlx5_devlink_info_get,
> > + .trap_init = mlx5_devlink_trap_init,
> > + .trap_fini = mlx5_devlink_trap_fini,
> > + .trap_action_set = mlx5_devlink_trap_action_set,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct devlink_ops mlx5_devlink_reload = {
> > .reload_actions = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_DRIVER_REINIT) |
> > BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_FW_ACTIVATE),
> > .reload_limits = BIT(DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_NO_RESET),
> > .reload_down = mlx5_devlink_reload_down,
> > .reload_up = mlx5_devlink_reload_up,
> > - .trap_init = mlx5_devlink_trap_init,
> > - .trap_fini = mlx5_devlink_trap_fini,
> > - .trap_action_set = mlx5_devlink_trap_action_set,
> > };
> >
> > void mlx5_devlink_trap_report(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int trap_id, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > @@ -791,6 +794,7 @@ static void mlx5_devlink_traps_unregister(struct devlink *devlink)
> >
> > int mlx5_devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink)
> > {
> > + struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
> > int err;
> >
> > err = devlink_params_register(devlink, mlx5_devlink_params,
> > @@ -808,6 +812,9 @@ int mlx5_devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink)
> > if (err)
> > goto traps_reg_err;
> >
> > + if (!mlx5_core_is_mp_slave(dev))
> > + devlink_set_ops(devlink, &mlx5_devlink_reload);
>
> Does this work? Where do you make a copy of the ops? ? You can't modify
> the driver-global ops, to state the obvious.
devlink_ops pointer is not constant at this stage, so why can't I copy
reload_* pointers to the "main" devlink ops?
I wanted to avoid to copy all pointers.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 12:00 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 0/5] Devlink reload and missed notifications fix Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 12:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/5] devlink: Add missed notifications iterators Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 13:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-29 12:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 2/5] devlink: Allow modification of devlink ops Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 12:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 3/5] devlink: Allow set specific ops callbacks dynamically Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 12:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-09-29 12:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 12:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 4/5] net/mlx5: Register separate reload devlink ops for multiport device Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 13:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 14:16 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-09-29 14:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 14:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 14:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 15:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 12:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] devlink: Delete reload enable/disable interface Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 13:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 0/5] Devlink reload and missed notifications fix Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 13:46 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-29 13:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 14:20 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 14:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 14:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 15:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-29 17:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 19:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVR1PKQjsBfvUTPU@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox