Intel-Wired-Lan Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: christopher.s.hall@intel.com
Cc: david.zage@intel.com, vinicius.gomes@intel.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>,
	rodrigo.cadore@l-acoustics.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 1/5] igc: Ensure the PTM cycle is reliably triggered
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:15:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrOdthE36RQy78fx@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240807003032.10300-2-christopher.s.hall@intel.com>

Hi Christopher,

On Aug  6 17:30, christopher.s.hall@intel.com wrote:
> From: Christopher S M Hall <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
> 
> Writing to clear the PTM status 'valid' bit while the PTM cycle is
> triggered results in unreliable PTM operation. To fix this, clear the
> PTM 'trigger' and status after each PTM transaction.
> 
> The issue can be reproduced with the following:
> 
> $ sudo phc2sys -R 1000 -O 0 -i tsn0 -m
> 
> Note: 1000 Hz (-R 1000) is unrealistically large, but provides a way to
> quickly reproduce the issue.
> 
> PHC2SYS exits with:
> 
> "ioctl PTP_OFFSET_PRECISE: Connection timed out" when the PTM transaction
>   fails

It would be great to add the problems encountered with kdump to the
commit message as well, as discussed with Vinicius, wouldn't it?

If you need a description, I can provide one.


Thanks,
Corinna


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-07 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-07  0:30 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 0/5] igc: PTM timeout fix christopher.s.hall
2024-08-07  0:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 1/5] igc: Ensure the PTM cycle is reliably triggered christopher.s.hall
2024-08-07  5:05   ` Paul Menzel
2024-08-07 16:15   ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2024-08-07 20:27     ` Hall, Christopher S
2024-08-08 14:50       ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-08-07  0:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 2/5] igc: Lengthen the hardware retry time to prevent timeouts christopher.s.hall
2024-08-08 14:54   ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-08-07  0:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 3/5] igc: Move ktime snapshot into PTM retry loop christopher.s.hall
2024-08-08 14:54   ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-08-07  0:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 4/5] igc: Reduce retry count to a more reasonable number christopher.s.hall
2024-08-07  5:28   ` Paul Menzel
2024-08-07  0:30 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 5/5] igc: Add lock preventing multiple simultaneous PTM transactions christopher.s.hall
2024-08-08 15:17   ` Corinna Vinschen
2024-10-11  9:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 0/5] igc: PTM timeout fix Corinna Vinschen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZrOdthE36RQy78fx@calimero.vinschen.de \
    --to=vinschen@redhat.com \
    --cc=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
    --cc=david.zage@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.cadore@l-acoustics.com \
    --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox