From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 04/14] scsi: megaraid_sas: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 20:31:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddee52a6-ac70-6e2d-b48e-e9bf38c94265@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210617182242.8637-5-nitesh@redhat.com>
On 2021-06-17 19:22, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
> The driver uses irq_set_affinity_hint() specifically for the high IOPS
> queue interrupts for two purposes:
>
> - To set the affinity_hint which is consumed by the userspace for
> ? distributing the interrupts
>
> - To apply an affinity that it provides
>
> The driver enforces its own affinity to bind the high IOPS queue interrupts
> to the local NUMA node. However, irq_set_affinity_hint() applying the
> provided cpumask as an affinity for the interrupt is an undocumented side
> effect.
>
> To remove this side effect irq_set_affinity_hint() has been marked
> as deprecated and new interfaces have been introduced. Hence, replace the
> irq_set_affinity_hint() with the new interface irq_set_affinity_and_hint()
> that clearly indicates the purpose of the usage and is meant to apply the
> affinity and set the affinity_hint pointer. Also, replace
> irq_set_affinity_hint() with irq_update_affinity_hint() when only
> affinity_hint needs to be updated.
>
> Change the megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_hint function name to
> megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_and_hint to clearly indicate that the
> function is setting both affinity and affinity_hint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 25 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> index 4d4e9dbe5193..54f4eac09589 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> @@ -5666,7 +5666,7 @@ megasas_setup_irqs_msix(struct megasas_instance *instance, u8 is_probe)
> "Failed to register IRQ for vector %d.\n", i);
> for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
> if (j < instance->low_latency_index_start)
> - irq_set_affinity_hint(
> + irq_update_affinity_hint(
> pci_irq_vector(pdev, j), NULL);
> free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, j),
> &instance->irq_context[j]);
> @@ -5709,7 +5709,7 @@ megasas_destroy_irqs(struct megasas_instance *instance) {
> if (instance->msix_vectors)
> for (i = 0; i < instance->msix_vectors; i++) {
> if (i < instance->low_latency_index_start)
> - irq_set_affinity_hint(
> + irq_update_affinity_hint(
> pci_irq_vector(instance->pdev, i), NULL);
> free_irq(pci_irq_vector(instance->pdev, i),
> &instance->irq_context[i]);
> @@ -5840,22 +5840,27 @@ int megasas_get_device_list(struct megasas_instance *instance)
> }
>
> /**
> - * megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_hint - Set affinity hint for high IOPS queues
> - * @instance: Adapter soft state
> - * return: void
> + * megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_and_hint - Set affinity and hint
> + * for high IOPS queues
> + * @instance: Adapter soft state
> + * return: void
> */
> static inline void
> -megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_hint(struct megasas_instance *instance)
> +megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_and_hint(struct megasas_instance *instance)
> {
> int i;
> + unsigned int irq;
> int local_numa_node;
> + const struct cpumask *mask;
>
> if (instance->perf_mode == MR_BALANCED_PERF_MODE) {
> local_numa_node = dev_to_node(&instance->pdev->dev);
Drive-by nit: you could assign mask in this scope.
> - for (i = 0; i < instance->low_latency_index_start; i++)
> - irq_set_affinity_hint(pci_irq_vector(instance->pdev, i),
> - cpumask_of_node(local_numa_node));
> + for (i = 0; i < instance->low_latency_index_start; i++) {
> + irq = pci_irq_vector(instance->pdev, i);
> + mask = cpumask_of_node(local_numa_node);
> + irq_update_affinity_hint(irq, mask);
And this doesn't seem to match what the commit message says?
Robin.
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -5944,7 +5949,7 @@ megasas_alloc_irq_vectors(struct megasas_instance *instance)
> instance->msix_vectors = 0;
>
> if (instance->smp_affinity_enable)
> - megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_hint(instance);
> + megasas_set_high_iops_queue_affinity_and_hint(instance);
> }
>
> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 18:22 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the usage of irq_set_affinity_hint Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 01/14] genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-25 17:52 ` Nitesh Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 02/14] iavf: Use irq_update_affinity_hint Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 03/14] i40e: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 04/14] scsi: megaraid_sas: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 19:31 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-06-17 19:34 ` Nitesh Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 05/14] scsi: mpt3sas: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 06/14] RDMA/i40iw: Use irq_update_affinity_hint Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 07/14] enic: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 08/14] be2net: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 09/14] ixgbe: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 10/14] mailbox: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 11/14] scsi: lpfc: Use irq_set_affinity Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 12/14] hinic: Use irq_set_affinity_and_hint Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 13/14] net/mlx5: Use irq_update_affinity_hint Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-21 8:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-17 18:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v1 14/14] net/mlx4: " Nitesh Narayan Lal
2021-06-21 8:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-21 12:59 ` Nitesh Lal
2021-06-25 21:08 ` Nitesh Lal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddee52a6-ac70-6e2d-b48e-e9bf38c94265@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox