From: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com" <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:15:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a25b038-693a-45d3-9ad6-ba709b7755a6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9839e7e9932330f9877402782ee411ada2e84df0.camel@intel.com>
Hi Jose,
On 4/29/2024 3:46 PM, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 11:05 +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> On 4/26/2024 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 12:56 +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>>>> The default behavior of device atomics depends on the
>>>> VM type and buffer allocation types. Device atomics are
>>>> expected to function with all types of allocations for
>>>> traditional applications/APIs. Additionally, in compute/SVM
>>>> API scenarios with fault mode or LR mode VMs, device atomics
>>>> must work with single-region allocations. In all other cases
>>>> device atomics should be disabled by default also on platforms
>>>> where we know device atomics doesn't on work on particular
>>>> allocations types.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Fix platform checks to correct atomics behaviour on PVC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>>>> index 5b7930f46cf3..237e4a4985a4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
>>>> @@ -619,9 +619,30 @@ xe_pt_stage_bind(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma,
>>>> struct xe_pt *pt = xe_vma_vm(vma)->pt_root[tile->id];
>>>> int ret;
>>>>
>>>> - if ((vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_ATOMIC_PTE_BIT) &&
>>>> - (is_devmem || !IS_DGFX(xe)))
>>>> - xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
>>>> + /**
>>>> + * Default atomic expectations for different allocation scenarios are as follows:
>>>> + *
>>>> + * 1. Traditional API: When the VM is not in fault mode or LR mode:
>>>> + * - Device atomics are expected to function with all allocations.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * 2. Compute/SVM API: When the VM is either in fault mode or LR mode:
>>>> + * - Device atomics are the default behavior when the bo is placed in a single region.
>>>> + * - In all other cases device atomics will be disabled with AE=0 until an application
>>>> + * request differently using a ioctl like madvise.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_ATOMIC_PTE_BIT) {
>>>> + if (xe_vm_in_fault_mode(xe_vma_vm(vma)) ||
>>>> + xe_vm_in_lr_mode(xe_vma_vm(vma))) {
>>> nit: xe_vm_in_fault_mode requires xe_vm_in_lr_mode, so you can just check for the later.
>> Will do that. I think scratch page is also part of non-traditional API,
>> I will confirm that and add that if needed.
> I think Mesa is the only driver that uses scratch patch.
In that case, enabling default atomics will be treated as in the 'else
case'/traditional-API so will not require any change.
Thanks,
Nirmoy
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nirmoy
>>
>>>> + if (bo && xe_bo_has_single_placement(bo))
>>>> + xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Unset AE if the platform(PVC) doesn't support it */
>>>> + if (!xe->info.has_device_atomics_on_smem && !is_devmem)
>>>> + xe_walk.default_pte &= ~XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> if (is_devmem) {
>>>> xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_PPGTT_PTE_DM;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>>>> index 8fc37c5a0196..f795016a80d5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
>>>> @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ static struct xe_vma *xe_vma_create(struct xe_vm *vm,
>>>> for_each_tile(tile, vm->xe, id)
>>>> vma->tile_mask |= 0x1 << id;
>>>>
>>>> - if (GRAPHICS_VER(vm->xe) >= 20 || vm->xe->info.platform == XE_PVC)
>>>> + if (vm->xe->info.has_atomic_enable_pte_bit)
>>>> vma->gpuva.flags |= XE_VMA_ATOMIC_PTE_BIT;
>>>>
>>>> vma->pat_index = pat_index;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 10:56 [PATCH v5 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 21:04 ` Souza, Jose
2024-04-29 9:05 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-29 13:46 ` Souza, Jose
2024-04-29 14:15 ` Nirmoy Das [this message]
2024-04-26 12:49 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-26 12:49 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 12:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:05 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:08 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:09 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:40 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 16:26 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-26 20:41 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev4) Patchwork
2024-04-26 20:42 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 20:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-29 9:11 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev5) Patchwork
2024-04-29 15:43 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings Mrozek, Michal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a25b038-693a-45d3-9ad6-ba709b7755a6@intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox