From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com" <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:46:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9839e7e9932330f9877402782ee411ada2e84df0.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f68727e7-03db-44f8-b5eb-7ceed550eddc@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 11:05 +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Hi Jose,
>
> On 4/26/2024 11:04 PM, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 12:56 +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> > > The default behavior of device atomics depends on the
> > > VM type and buffer allocation types. Device atomics are
> > > expected to function with all types of allocations for
> > > traditional applications/APIs. Additionally, in compute/SVM
> > > API scenarios with fault mode or LR mode VMs, device atomics
> > > must work with single-region allocations. In all other cases
> > > device atomics should be disabled by default also on platforms
> > > where we know device atomics doesn't on work on particular
> > > allocations types.
> > >
> > > v2: Fix platform checks to correct atomics behaviour on PVC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > index 5b7930f46cf3..237e4a4985a4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c
> > > @@ -619,9 +619,30 @@ xe_pt_stage_bind(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_vma *vma,
> > > struct xe_pt *pt = xe_vma_vm(vma)->pt_root[tile->id];
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - if ((vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_ATOMIC_PTE_BIT) &&
> > > - (is_devmem || !IS_DGFX(xe)))
> > > - xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
> > > + /**
> > > + * Default atomic expectations for different allocation scenarios are as follows:
> > > + *
> > > + * 1. Traditional API: When the VM is not in fault mode or LR mode:
> > > + * - Device atomics are expected to function with all allocations.
> > > + *
> > > + * 2. Compute/SVM API: When the VM is either in fault mode or LR mode:
> > > + * - Device atomics are the default behavior when the bo is placed in a single region.
> > > + * - In all other cases device atomics will be disabled with AE=0 until an application
> > > + * request differently using a ioctl like madvise.
> > > + */
> > > + if (vma->gpuva.flags & XE_VMA_ATOMIC_PTE_BIT) {
> > > + if (xe_vm_in_fault_mode(xe_vma_vm(vma)) ||
> > > + xe_vm_in_lr_mode(xe_vma_vm(vma))) {
> > nit: xe_vm_in_fault_mode requires xe_vm_in_lr_mode, so you can just check for the later.
>
> Will do that. I think scratch page is also part of non-traditional API,
> I will confirm that and add that if needed.
I think Mesa is the only driver that uses scratch patch.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nirmoy
>
> >
> > > + if (bo && xe_bo_has_single_placement(bo))
> > > + xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
> > > + } else {
> > > + xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Unset AE if the platform(PVC) doesn't support it */
> > > + if (!xe->info.has_device_atomics_on_smem && !is_devmem)
> > > + xe_walk.default_pte &= ~XE_USM_PPGTT_PTE_AE;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > if (is_devmem) {
> > > xe_walk.default_pte |= XE_PPGTT_PTE_DM;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > index 8fc37c5a0196..f795016a80d5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> > > @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ static struct xe_vma *xe_vma_create(struct xe_vm *vm,
> > > for_each_tile(tile, vm->xe, id)
> > > vma->tile_mask |= 0x1 << id;
> > >
> > > - if (GRAPHICS_VER(vm->xe) >= 20 || vm->xe->info.platform == XE_PVC)
> > > + if (vm->xe->info.has_atomic_enable_pte_bit)
> > > vma->gpuva.flags |= XE_VMA_ATOMIC_PTE_BIT;
> > >
> > > vma->pat_index = pat_index;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 10:56 [PATCH v5 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_atomic_enable_pte_bit device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] drm/xe: Move vm bind bo validation to a helper function Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] drm/xe: Introduce has_device_atomics_on_smem device info Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] drm/xe: Add function to check if BO has single placement Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 10:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/xe: Refactor default device atomic settings Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 21:04 ` Souza, Jose
2024-04-29 9:05 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-29 13:46 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2024-04-29 14:15 ` Nirmoy Das
2024-04-26 12:49 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev3) Patchwork
2024-04-26 12:49 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 12:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:05 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:08 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:09 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 13:40 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 16:26 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-26 20:41 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev4) Patchwork
2024-04-26 20:42 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 20:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-29 9:11 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for Refactor default device atomic settings (rev5) Patchwork
2024-04-29 15:43 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Refactor default device atomic settings Mrozek, Michal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9839e7e9932330f9877402782ee411ada2e84df0.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox