Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/configfs: Add attribute to disable GT types
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 15:24:03 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <175856544316.2439.1266660399029330345@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918211319.603324-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Quoting Matt Roper (2025-09-18 18:13:19-03:00)
>Preventing the driver from initializing GTs of specific type(s) can be
>useful for debugging and early hardware bringup.  Add a configfs
>attribute to allow this kind of control for debugging.
>
>With today's platforms and software design, this configuration setting
>is only effective for disabling the media GT since the driver currently
>requires that there always be a primary GT to probe the device.  However
>this might change in the future ---  in theory it should be possible
>(with some additional driver work) to allow an igpu device to come up
>with only the media GT and no primary GT.  Or to allow an igpu device to
>come up with no GTs at all (for display-only usage).  A primary GT will
>likely always be required on dgpu platforms because we rely on the BCS
>engines inside the primary GT for various vram operations.
>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h |   2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c      |  18 +++++
> 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
>index e52808e3199f..c675994439d4 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
>@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> 
> #include "xe_configfs.h"
>+#include "xe_gt_types.h"
> #include "xe_hw_engine_types.h"
> #include "xe_module.h"
> #include "xe_pci_types.h"
>@@ -54,6 +55,7 @@
>  *        :
>  *        └── 0000:03:00.0
>  *            ├── survivability_mode
>+ *            ├── gt_types_allowed
>  *            ├── engines_allowed
>  *            └── enable_psmi
>  *
>@@ -77,6 +79,40 @@
>  *
>  * This attribute can only be set before binding to the device.
>  *
>+ * Allowed GT types:
>+ * -----------------
>+ *
>+ * Allow only specific types of GTs to be detected and initialized by the
>+ * driver.  Any combination of GT types can be enabled/disabled, although
>+ * some settings will cause the device to fail to probe.

I think it would be nice to have a short description of input/output
formats. Something like:

    Writes support both comma- and newline-separated input format. Reads
    will always return one GT type per line. The supported GT types are
    primary and media.

>+ *
>+ * Examples:
>+ *
>+ * Allow both primary and media GTs to be initialized and used.  This matches
>+ * the driver's default behavior::
>+ *
>+ *        # echo 'primary,media' > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:03:00.0/gt_types_allowed
>+ *
>+ * Allow only the primary GT of each tile to be initialized and used,
>+ * effectively disabling the media GT if it exists on the platform::
>+ *
>+ *        # echo 'primary' > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:03:00.0/gt_types_allowed
>+ *
>+ * Allow only the media GT of each tile to be initialized and used,
>+ * effectively disabling the primary GT.  **This configuration will cause
>+ * device probe failure on all current platforms, but may be allowed on
>+ * igpu platforms in the future**::
>+ *
>+ *        # echo 'media' > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:03:00.0/gt_types_allowed
>+ *
>+ * Disable all GTs.  Only other GPU IP (such as display) is potentially usable.
>+ * **This configuration will cause device probe failure on all current
>+ * platforms, but may be allowed on igpu platforms in the future**::
>+ *
>+ *        # echo '' > /sys/kernel/config/xe/0000:03:00.0/gt_types_allowed
>+ *
>+ * This attribute can only be set before binding to the device.

I think this line could appear before the examples.

>+ *
>  * Allowed engines:
>  * ----------------
>  *
>@@ -127,6 +163,7 @@ struct xe_config_group_device {
>         struct config_group group;
> 
>         struct xe_config_device {
>+                u64 gt_types_allowed;
>                 u64 engines_allowed;
>                 bool survivability_mode;
>                 bool enable_psmi;
>@@ -139,6 +176,7 @@ struct xe_config_group_device {
> };
> 
> static const struct xe_config_device device_defaults = {
>+        .gt_types_allowed = U64_MAX,
>         .engines_allowed = U64_MAX,
>         .survivability_mode = false,
>         .enable_psmi = false,
>@@ -157,6 +195,7 @@ struct engine_info {
> /* Some helpful macros to aid on the sizing of buffer allocation when parsing */
> #define MAX_ENGINE_CLASS_CHARS 5
> #define MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE_CHARS 2
>+#define MAX_GT_TYPE_CHARS 7
> 
> static const struct engine_info engine_info[] = {
>         { .cls = "rcs", .mask = XE_HW_ENGINE_RCS_MASK },
>@@ -167,6 +206,14 @@ static const struct engine_info engine_info[] = {
>         { .cls = "gsccs", .mask = XE_HW_ENGINE_GSCCS_MASK },
> };
> 
>+static const struct {
>+        const char *name;

I wonder if it would be good to use name[MAX_GT_TYPE_CHARS +
1] here.  That way we get warnings if the strings don't match the
expectation.

>+        u64 type;

Hm... I would have gone with the enum type here.  Any specific reason we
chose u64 here?

>+} gt_types[] = {
>+        { .name = "primary", .type = XE_GT_TYPE_MAIN },
>+        { .name = "media", .type = XE_GT_TYPE_MEDIA },
>+};
>+
> static struct xe_config_group_device *to_xe_config_group_device(struct config_item *item)
> {
>         return container_of(to_config_group(item), struct xe_config_group_device, group);
>@@ -229,6 +276,55 @@ static ssize_t survivability_mode_store(struct config_item *item, const char *pa
>         return len;
> }
> 
>+static ssize_t gt_types_allowed_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
>+{
>+        struct xe_config_device *dev = to_xe_config_device(item);
>+        char *p = page;
>+
>+        for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gt_types); i++)
>+                if (dev->gt_types_allowed & BIT_ULL(gt_types[i].type))
>+                        p += sprintf(p, "%s\n", gt_types[i].name);
>+
>+        return p - page;
>+}
>+
>+static ssize_t gt_types_allowed_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page,
>+                                      size_t len)
>+{
>+        struct xe_config_group_device *dev = to_xe_config_group_device(item);
>+        const char *p = page;
>+        u64 typemask = 0;
>+
>+        while (p < page + len) {
>+                size_t typelen = strcspn(p, ",\n");
>+                bool matched = false;
>+
>+                if (typelen > MAX_GT_TYPE_CHARS)
>+                        return -EINVAL;
>+
>+                for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gt_types); i++) {
>+                        if (strncmp(p, gt_types[i].name, typelen) == 0) {

I think we are allowing values like "pri", "me" etc in p to match
gt_types[i].name here.  Is that intentional?

>+                                typemask |= BIT(gt_types[i].type);
>+                                matched = true;
>+                                break;
>+                        }
>+                }
>+
>+                if (!matched)
>+                        return -EINVAL;
>+
>+                p += typelen + 1;
>+        }
>+
>+        guard(mutex)(&dev->lock);
>+        if (is_bound(dev))
>+                return -EBUSY;
>+
>+        dev->config.gt_types_allowed = typemask;
>+
>+        return len;
>+}
>+
> static ssize_t engines_allowed_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
> {
>         struct xe_config_device *dev = to_xe_config_device(item);
>@@ -342,11 +438,13 @@ static ssize_t enable_psmi_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page, siz
> }
> 
> CONFIGFS_ATTR(, enable_psmi);
>+CONFIGFS_ATTR(, gt_types_allowed);
> CONFIGFS_ATTR(, engines_allowed);
> CONFIGFS_ATTR(, survivability_mode);
> 
> static struct configfs_attribute *xe_config_device_attrs[] = {
>         &attr_enable_psmi,
>+        &attr_gt_types_allowed,
>         &attr_engines_allowed,
>         &attr_survivability_mode,
>         NULL,
>@@ -513,6 +611,7 @@ static void dump_custom_dev_config(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>                                  dev->config.attr_); \
>         } while (0)
> 
>+        PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%llx", gt_types_allowed);
>         PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%llx", engines_allowed);
>         PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%d", enable_psmi);
>         PRI_CUSTOM_ATTR("%d", survivability_mode);
>@@ -563,6 +662,26 @@ bool xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>         return mode;
> }
> 
>+/**
>+ * xe_configfs_get_gt_types_allowed - get GT type allowed mask from configfs
>+ * @pdev: pci device
>+ *
>+ * Return: GT type mask set in configfs
>+ */
>+u64 xe_configfs_get_gt_types_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>+{
>+        struct xe_config_group_device *dev = find_xe_config_group_device(pdev);
>+        u64 mask;
>+
>+        if (!dev)
>+                return device_defaults.gt_types_allowed;
>+
>+        mask = dev->config.gt_types_allowed;
>+        config_group_put(&dev->group);
>+
>+        return mask;
>+}
>+
> /**
>  * xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed - get engine allowed mask from configfs
>  * @pdev: pci device
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
>index 1402e863b71c..eddb66201edf 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
>@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ int xe_configfs_init(void);
> void xe_configfs_exit(void);
> void xe_configfs_check_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> bool xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>+u64 xe_configfs_get_gt_types_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> u64 xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> bool xe_configfs_get_psmi_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> #else
>@@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ static inline int xe_configfs_init(void) { return 0; }
> static inline void xe_configfs_exit(void) { }
> static inline void xe_configfs_check_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
> static inline bool xe_configfs_get_survivability_mode(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
>+static inline u64 xe_configfs_get_gt_types_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return U64_MAX; }
> static inline u64 xe_configfs_get_engines_allowed(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return U64_MAX; }
> static inline bool xe_configfs_get_psmi_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev) { return false; }
> #endif
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>index 77bee811a150..f065b8ea5673 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
>@@ -668,8 +668,21 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
>         const struct xe_media_desc *media_desc;
>         struct xe_tile *tile;
>         struct xe_gt *gt;
>+        u64 gt_types_allowed;
>         u8 id;
> 
>+        /*
>+         * It's not currently possible to probe a device with the primary
>+         * GT disabled.  With some work, this may be future in the possible
>+         * for igpu platforms (although probably not for dgpu's since access
>+         * to the primary GT's BCS engines is required for VRAM management).
>+         */
>+        gt_types_allowed = xe_configfs_get_gt_types_allowed(to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev));
>+        if ((gt_types_allowed & BIT_ULL(XE_GT_TYPE_MAIN)) == 0) {
>+                drm_err(&xe->drm, "Cannot probe device with primary GT disabled via configfs\n");
>+                return -ENODEV;
>+        }
>+
>         /*
>          * If this platform supports GMD_ID, we'll detect the proper IP
>          * descriptor to use from hardware registers.
>@@ -761,6 +774,11 @@ static int xe_info_init(struct xe_device *xe,
>                 if (MEDIA_VER(xe) < 13 || !media_desc)
>                         continue;
> 
>+                if ((gt_types_allowed & BIT_ULL(XE_GT_TYPE_MEDIA)) == 0) {
>+                        drm_info(&xe->drm, "Media GT disabled via configfs\n");
>+                        continue;
>+                }
>+

Shouldn't we do this before updating gt->info.engine_mask (where gt is
the primary GT)?

--
Gustavo Sousa

>                 /*
>                  * Allocate and setup media GT for platforms with standalone
>                  * media.
>-- 
>2.51.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-22 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18 21:13 [PATCH 0/2] Allow configfs to disable specific GT type(s) Matt Roper
2025-09-18 21:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/huc: Adjust HuC check on primary GT Matt Roper
2025-09-19  9:32   ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2025-09-22 14:39   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2025-09-18 21:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/configfs: Add attribute to disable GT types Matt Roper
2025-09-22 18:24   ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-09-24  2:36   ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=175856544316.2439.1266660399029330345@intel.com \
    --to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox